Congress OKs historic marriage bill
Biden to sign ‘step’ safeguarding gay, interracial nuptials
WASHINGTON — The House gave final approval Thursday to legislation protecting same-sex marriages, a monumental step in a decadeslong battle for nationwide recognition that reflects a stark turnaround in societal attitudes.
President Joe Biden has said he will promptly sign the measure, which requires all states to recognize samesex marriages.
It is a relief for hundreds of thousands of couples who have married since the Supreme Court’s 2015 decision that legalized those marriages and have worried about what would happen if the ruling were ever overturned.
Biden called the legislation a “critical step to ensure that Americans have the right to marry the person they love.”
The bipartisan legislation, which passed 258-169 with 39 Republican votes, would also protect interracial unions by requiring states to recognize legal marriages regardless of “sex, race, ethnicity, or national origin.”
After months of negotiations, the Senate passed the bill last week with 12 Republican votes.
Democrats moved the bill quickly through the House and Senate after the Supreme Court’s decision in June that overturned the federal right to an abortion — including a concurring opinion from Justice Clarence Thomas that suggested the 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges decision legalizing same-sex marriage could also be reconsidered.
While many Republicans predicted that was unlikely to happen, and said the bill was unnecessary, Democrats and GOP supporters of the bill said it shouldn’t
be left to chance.
“We need it,” said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who presided over the vote as one of her last acts in leadership before stepping aside in January. “It is magic.”
The bill is “a glorious triumph of love and freedom,” Pelosi said, tearing up as she celebrated its passage.
In debate before the vote, several gay members of Congress talked about what a federal law would mean for them and their families.
Rep. Mark Pocan, D-Wis., said he and his husband should be able to visit each other in the hospital just like any other married couple and receive spousal benefits “regardless of if your spouse’s name is Samuel or Samantha.”
Rep. Chris Pappas, D-N.H., said he was set to marry “the love of my life” next year and it is “unthinkable”
that his marriage might not be recognized in some states if Obergefell were to be overturned.
The legislation lost some Republican support since July, when 47 Republicans voted for it — a robust and unexpected show of support that kick-started serious negotiations in the Senate. But most of those lawmakers held firm, with a cross section of the party, from conservatives to moderates, voting for the bill.
House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy voted against it.
“To me this is really just standing with the Constitution,” said Rep. Ann Wagner, R-Mo., who voted for the bill both times. She pushed back on GOP arguments that it would affect the religious rights of those who don’t believe in same-sex marriage.
“No one’s religious liberties are affected in any way, shape or form,” Wagner said.
Rep. Chris Stewart, R-Utah, said he was “proud to once again vote in favor of protecting our LGBTQ and religious friends and neighbors.”
He praised Senate changes to the bill ensuring that it would not affect current rights of religious institutions and groups.
The legislation would not require states to allow same-sex couples to marry, as Obergefell now does.
But it would require states to recognize all marriages that were legal where they were performed and protect current same-sex unions if the Supreme Court decision were overturned.
While it’s not everything advocates may have wanted, passage of the legislation represents a watershed
moment.
Just a decade ago, many Republicans openly campaigned on blocking same-sex marriages; today more than two-thirds of the public support them.
Still, most Republicans opposed the legislation and some conservative advocacy groups lobbied aggressively against it in recent weeks, arguing that it doesn’t do enough to protect those who want to refuse services for same-sex couples.
Rep. Vicky Hartzler, R-Mo., choked up as she begged colleagues to vote against the bill, which she said undermines “natural marriage” between a man and a woman.
“I’ll tell you my priorities,” Hartzler said. “Protect religious liberty, protect people of faith and protect Americans who believe in the true meaning of marriage.”
In the end, several religious groups came out in support of the bill.
Thursday’s vote came as the LGBTQ community has faced violent attacks, such as the shooting this month at a gay nightclub in Colorado that killed five people and injured at least 17.
“We have been through a lot,” said Kelley Robinson, incoming president of the advocacy group Human Rights Campaign.
But Robinson said the votes show “in such an important way” that the country values LBGTQ people.
“We are part of the full story of what it means to be an American,” said Robinson, who was inside the Senate chamber for last week’s vote with her wife and son.
“It really speaks to them validating our love.”