Do sibling’s ‘free-range’ kids stray too far?

My brother has two daughters, ages 4 and 6. Ever since they could walk, my brother and his wife have given the girls free range at family events and parties, where they are allowed to go off by themselves for an hour or so.

The kids are very active and don’t sit still for more than a couple of minutes at a time. They will basically disappear upstairs or go outside with other kids.

To me, this isn’t safe. I’d be worried they could fall or have an accident.

During Thanksgiving, my 4-year-old niece was running on a deck near a pond by herself. My brother and his wife were inside socializing. I think my brother and his wife are just lazy parents and let the kids do whatever they want. Should I say something?

— Anonymous

Even more attentive parents let their kids “free range” when they’re at family events where there are other adults and often older children around. This definitely carries risks, because parents sometimes check out, or they assume other adults have an eye on their children when they don’t.

Unless you have spent time with this family in their home, accompanying them and their children throughout a fairly “normal” day, then you don’t really know what kind of parents they are.

I think that “free-range” parenting is great — and that letting kids explore and try things on their own helps them to develop judgment, self-confidence and resilience.

Dear Anonymous:

So back, now, to family events and parties. If there is a deck with a loose railing, a swimming pool, pond or creek, a busy road, creepy neighbors or family members (or other obvious hazards), an adult should be assigned (or assign themselves) to loosely supervise the children. Because you are vigilant and you care — this might be a good job for you.

Dear Amy: My husband and I recently adopted a baby boy. We started out as foster parents with parental reunification as the goal. Unfortunately, the parents were not able to satisfy the requirements of the social agencies involved, and none of his other relatives were able to adopt him.

Due to our age (in our 60s), we were doubtful the judge would grant our request to adopt our son, but we have since learned that there are grandparents and even great-grandparents adopting children. Fortunately, the judge recognized the bond we all had and allowed us to adopt this dear baby.

This was a long and stressful process, but for the love of this child, we would do it all over again.

My question is this: When we are out in public, people will inevitably ask, “grandson?” When we say, “parents” people are understandably shocked.

Should we just ignore the looks or say, “adoptive parents?” It is important to us that this baby does not feel any less than our own biological child. How should we respond?

— Older, Wiser, Happier

Dear Happier: In adopting your son, you’ve joined the growing demographic of elders raising children. Almost 3 million American grandparents have full responsibility for raising grandchildren; countless other grandparents, greatgrandparents and other elders provide part-time child care.

In terms of responding to people who assume you are grandparents: While your son is young, you might say, “We’re parents! The adoption came through last year.” When your son is older and aware of the question, you can simply respond brightly, “We’re not grandparents — we’re his proud parents!”

Make sure to include your son in his adoption story starting now. He’s likely to encounter this question many times, from a different angle.

Even when this query is annoying, I hope you will always lead with your joy. Dear Amy: I was disgusted with your reply to “Distracted Concertgoer,” who complained about a crying baby at a community band concert. What has happened to parents? What would possess them to bring a baby to a concert in the first place? This is flat-out rude.

Dear Appalled: I assume that these parents likely had another child, parent or other family member participating. That’s what community concerts are all about!