Press-Telegram (Long Beach)

ROE V. WADE OVERTURNED

On Friday, the Supreme Court ended constituti­onal protection­s for abortion that had stood in America for nearly a half-century. It comes as no surprise since there was a breach of Supreme Court confidenti­ality and secrecy when Politico obtained a draft of

- STAFF PHOTOGRAPH­ER KEITH BIRMINGHAM By KURT SNIBBE | Southern California News Group

The decision by the court’s conservati­ve majority (6-3 decision) overturned the landmark Roe v. Wade ruling and is expected to lead to abortion bans in roughly half the states.

A brief timeline:

June 1970: A Texas district court ruled that the state’s abortion ban was illegal because it violated a constituti­onal right to privacy.

Roe is actually Norma McCorvey, who went to court against Henry Wade, the district attorney of Dallas County. Wade declared he’d continue to prosecute doctors who performed abortions. The case eventually was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. McCorvey gave birth and put the child up for adoption.

1971: The Supreme Court agrees to hear the case filed by Roe against Wade. Wade was ignoring the legal ruling and both sides appealed.

Dec. 13, 1971: The case is argued before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Oct. 11, 1972: The case is reargued before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Jan. 22, 1973: The U.S. Supreme Court, in a 7-2 decision, affirms the legality of a woman’s right to have an abortion under the 14th Amendment to the Constituti­on.

The 1973 decision by the court

The court divided pregnancy into three trimesters and declared that the choice to end a pregnancy in the first trimester was solely up to the woman. In the second trimester, the government could regulate abortion, although not ban it, in order to protect the mother’s health.

In the third trimester, the state could prohibit abortion to protect a fetus that could survive on its own outside the womb, except when a woman’s health was in danger.

The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constituti­on was ratified in 1868 during the Reconstruc­tion era to abolish slavery and establish civil and legal rights for Black Americans. The third clause, “nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty or property, without due process of law,” expanded the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment to apply to the states as well as the federal government.

Over time, the Supreme Court has interprete­d this clause to guarantee a wide array of rights against infringeme­nt by the states, as well as the right to privacy and other fundamenta­l rights not mentioned elsewhere in the Constituti­on.

Changing sides

In 1997, McCorvey started Roe No More, an anti-abortion outreach organizati­on that was dissolved in 2008. She was received into the Catholic Church in 1998.

In 2003, McCorvey filed a motion with the federal district court in Dallas to have the case overturned and asked the court to consider new evidence that abortion hurts women. The motion is dismissed in 2004.

Shortly before her death on Feb. 18, 2017, McCorvey was interviewe­d for the documentar­y “AKA Jane Roe,” which was released in 2020. McCorvey told the film’s director that she hadn’t changed her mind about abortion but became an anti-abortion activist because she was being paid.

There are conflictin­g views of how she felt about the issue from many sources.

Today's arguments

The leaked documents were from the case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organizati­on about the constituti­onality of a 2018 Mississipp­i state law that bans most abortion procedures after the first 15 weeks of pregnancy. Lower courts have prevented enforcemen­t of the law with preliminar­y injunction­s.

Oral arguments before the Supreme Court were held in December 2021.

What's a trigger law?

McCorvey in 1989

35

30

Has an abortion ban that predates 1973

Already bans abortions after six weeks

Has a trigger law

Has multiple laws banning abortion

Net illegal: 37% no exceptions/illegal, some exceptions 25 20 15 10 5

More than half of Americans who generally support abortion rights – by saying it should be legal in “most” or “all” cases – also say the timing of an abortion should be a factor in determinin­g its legality.

The same share of people who generally support legal abortion say abortion providers should be required to get the consent of a parent or guardian before performing an abortion on a minor.

Among those who say abortion should be against the law in most or all cases, nearly half say it should be legal if the pregnancy threatens the health or life of the woman.

Nearly 6 in 10 adults say they think stricter abortion laws would reduce the number of abortions performed in the United States.

More than half agree with the statement “human life begins at conception, so a fetus is a person with rights.” 1973 level

 ?? ?? Activists from @rise4abort­ionrights protest against the potential overturnin­g of Roe v. Wade in front of the U.S. federal courthouse in Los Angeles on Thursday.
Nearly half of states will effectivel­y ban all or most abortions now that the Supreme Court has overturned Roe vs. Wade.
Activists from @rise4abort­ionrights protest against the potential overturnin­g of Roe v. Wade in front of the U.S. federal courthouse in Los Angeles on Thursday. Nearly half of states will effectivel­y ban all or most abortions now that the Supreme Court has overturned Roe vs. Wade.
 ?? ?? What's the 14th Amendment:
What's the 14th Amendment:

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States