Press-Telegram (Long Beach)

Congress must be held accountabl­e for budget

- Vero■ique de Rugy Columnist Veronique de Rugy is the George Gibbs Chair in Political Economy and a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University.

You've undoubtedl­y noticed how up-in-arms everyone becomes when the government is on the verge of shutting down. I've also noticed that the people who most loudly express their horror at the notion of a partial government closure seem totally comfortabl­e with the fiscal wall we are barreling into. That wall is being built, brick by brick, by two political parties that are unwilling to end Washington's spending debauchery.

This isn't to deny that some people would have been hurt by the recently averted shutdown (which, by the way, would not have made our debt smaller). It's a call for consistenc­y from anyone putting their good-government sensibilit­ies on display.

Those sounding the loudest alarms last week are largely silent on the countless occasions when Congress ignores its own budgetary rules. They are rarely outraged when the government is financed with legislatio­n that only expands the balance sheet regardless of whether the money is well spent. All that seems to matter is that government is metaphoric­ally funded, since it usually means growing deficits and explosive debt.

Democrats and Republican­s alike engage in fiscal recklessne­ss by passing spending bills they don't have the first cent to pay for. Politician­s who won't be around to pay the costs shower today's voters with money that must be repaid by tomorrow's taxpayers, many of whom aren't yet born.

They rashly dispense tax credits, loan guarantees and subsidies to big companies to do what they were going to do without these government­granted favors. The most recent example of this folly is the Inflation Reduction Act, which doled out billions in subsidies to green energy companies for projects most of the recipients had announced months before the bill was passed.

Republican­s and Democrats also share in the habit of reupping subsidies to large agricultur­al interests, which often raise the price of food. They sneakily bundled those subsidies into a bill that hands out Supplement­al Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits — formerly known as food stamps — to the tune of $145 billion in 2023 (an increase from $63 billion in 2019).

Beyond the hidden subsidies, the SNAP program is ineffectiv­e at lifting families out of poverty. SNAP is designed in ways that likely create disincenti­ves to work. American Enterprise Institute scholars have shown that as many as 71% of households receiving food stamps contain no workers and only about 6% have a full-time worker. If earning extra money means losing even more in government benefits, many people will understand­ably choose not to. Ultimately, such a system is bad for recipients and their children, who remain impoverish­ed. Yet it persists because Congress won't do much about it.

But the worst is of course the bipartisan refusal to reform Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. Most of this spending is on autopilot, allowing Congress to repeatedly ignore the problem and others to argue that we should further increase benefits. It's also the driver of our current and future debt. Where's the outrage about this fiscal madness? Where are the demands that politician­s show us their plans for reform?

One thing's for sure: these calls aren't coming from the shutdown alarmists. How many of them write similarly panicky commentari­es about how, in about 10 years, Congress' blatant inaction will lead to across-the-board cuts to entitlemen­t benefits for both the rich and the poor? After all, if legislator­s decide to borrow more to avoid cuts rather than reforming the programs, it will add another $116 trillion over 30 years to our debt just for Medicare and Medicaid.

Newspapers should be full of reports about how Congress repeatedly fails to perform its core function and avoid this level of fiscal drama altogether. Elected officials should be too embarrasse­d to show their faces in public. Instead, they can just promise more spending because the real “crisis” is apparently that someone is trying to slam on the brakes — not that there's a fiscal wall looming ahead.

The federal budget is on a treacherou­s path and Congress is to blame. Politician­s are continuous­ly delinquent on their obligation to be good stewards of our fiscal health, but the “irresponsi­bility” that most reporters and commentato­rs raise their voices against is the risk of shutdown. These people are upset about the symptoms, not the fatal disease.

The ultimate blame rests on the shoulders of the American people. We routinely elect politician­s without care for our fiscal situation. Politician­s respond to incentives, and voters mostly signal that we won't punish them for poor performanc­e. The alarm is ringing. It's time to wake up, America.

 ?? STEPHANIE SCARBROUGH — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., meets with Laphonza Butler before she is sworn in to succeed the late Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., on Tuesday on Capitol Hill in Washington.
STEPHANIE SCARBROUGH — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., meets with Laphonza Butler before she is sworn in to succeed the late Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., on Tuesday on Capitol Hill in Washington.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States