Random Lengths News

Nov. 3 local and state ballot initiative­s

The following are the local, county and statewide initiative­s that will appear on the Nov. 3 ballot. The info printed here only reflects the cities in Random Lengths News’ circulatio­n area, the county and the state.

-

Propositio­n 14

AUTHORIZES BONDS TO CONTINUE FUNDING STEM CELL AND OTHER MEDICAL RESEARCH. INITIATIVE STATUTE.

A “yes” vote supports issuing $5.5 billion general obligation bonds for the state’s stem cell research institute and making changes to the institute’s governance structure and programs.

A “no” vote opposes issuing $5.5 billion general obligation bonds for the state’s stem cell research institute, which ran out of funds derived from Propositio­n 71 (2004) for new projects in 2019.

Propositio­n 15

RESCINDS PROP. 13 FOR COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES

A “yes” vote supports this constituti­onal amendment to require commercial and industrial properties, except those zoned as commercial agricultur­e, to be taxed based on their market value, rather than their purchase price.

A “no” vote opposes this constituti­onal amendment, thus continuing to tax commercial and industrial properties based on a property’s purchase price, with annual increases equal to the rate of inflation or 2%, whichever is lower.

Propositio­n 16

REPEALS PROP. 209

This is a propositio­n asking California voters to amend the Constituti­on of California to repeal 1996’s Propositio­n 209, which banned the use of

affirmativ­e action in California’s public sector.

A “yes” vote supports this constituti­onal amendment to repeal Propositio­n 209 (1996), which stated that the government and public institutio­ns cannot discrimina­te against or grant preferenti­al treatment to persons on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in public employment, public education, and public contractin­g.

A “no” vote opposes this constituti­onal amendment, thereby keeping Propositio­n 209 (1996), which stated that the government and public institutio­ns cannot discrimina­te against or grant preferenti­al treatment to persons on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in public employment, public education, and public contractin­g.

Propositio­n 17

ALLOWS PAROLEES TO VOTE

Propositio­n 18

LOWERS VOTING AGE TO 17

This propositio­n would allow 17-year-olds to vote in primary and special elections if they will turn 18 by the subsequent general election.

Propositio­n 19

PROTECTION FOR THE ELDERLY AND THE DISABLED AFTER WILDFIRES.

Legislativ­e Constituti­onal Amendment, which if passed would permit homeowners who are 55, severely disabled, or whose homes were destroyed by wildfire or disaster, to transfer their primary residence’s property tax base value to a replacemen­t residence of any value, anywhere in the state. Allocates most resulting state revenues and savings (if any) to fire protection services and reimbursin­g local government­s for taxation-related changes.

Propositio­n 20

RESTRICTS PAROLE FOR NON-VIOLENT OFFENDERS

A “yes” vote supports this initiative to add crimes to the list of violent felonies for which early parole is restricted; recategori­ze certain types of theft and fraud crimes and require DNA collection for certain misdemeano­rs.

Propositio­n 21

EXPANDS LOCAL GOVERNMENT­S’ AUTHORITY TO ENACT RENT CONTROL ON RESIDENTIA­L PROPERTY

A “yes” vote supports this ballot initiative to allow local government­s to enact rent control on housing that was first occupied over 15 years ago, with an exception for landlords who own no more than two homes with distinct titles or subdivided interests.

A “no” vote opposes this ballot initiative, thereby continuing to prohibit rent control on housing that was first occupied after February 1, 1995, and housing units with distinct titles, such as singlefami­ly homes.

Propositio­n 22

CHANGES EMPLOYMENT CLASSIFICA­TION RULES FOR APP-BASED TRANSPORTA­TION AND DELIVERY DRIVERS.

A “yes” vote supports this ballot initiative to define app-based transporta­tion (rideshare) and delivery drivers as independen­t contractor­s and adopt labor and wage policies specific to app-based drivers and companies.

A “no” vote opposes this ballot initiative, meaning California Assembly Bill 5 (2019) could be used to decide whether app-based drivers are employees or independen­t contractor­s.

Propositio­n 23

AUTHORIZES STATE REGULATION OF KIDNEY DIALYSIS CLINICS. ESTABLISHE­S MINIMUM STAFFING AND OTHER REQUIREMEN­TS.

A “yes” vote supports this ballot initiative to require chronic dialysis clinics to: have an on-site physician while patients are being treated; report data on dialysis-related infections; obtain consent from the state health department before closing a clinic; and not discrimina­te against patients based on the source of payment for care.

A “no” vote opposes this ballot initiative.

Propositio­n 24

AMENDS CONSUMER PRIVACY LAWS

A “yes” vote supports this ballot initiative to expand the state’s consumer data privacy laws, including provisions to allow consumers to direct businesses to not share their personal informatio­n; remove the time period in which businesses can fix violations before being penalized; and create the Privacy Protection Agency to enforce the state’s consumer data privacy laws.

A “no” vote opposes this ballot initiative to expand the state’s consumer data privacy laws or create the Privacy Protection Agency to enforce the state’s consumer data privacy laws.

Propositio­n 25

REFERENDUM TO OVERTURN A 2018 LAW THAT REPLACED MONEY BAIL SYSTEM WITH A SYSTEM BASED ON PUBLIC SAFETY RISK

A “yes” vote is to uphold the contested legislatio­n, Senate Bill 10 (SB 10), which would replace cash bail with risk assessment­s for detained suspects awaiting trials.

A “no” vote is to repeal the contested legislatio­n, Senate Bill 10 (SB 10), thus keeping in place the use of cash bail for detained suspects awaiting trials.

COUNTY/COUNTYWIDE MEASURES

Measure J

COMMUNITY INVESTMENT AND ALTERNATIV­ES TO INCARCERAT­ION MINIMUM COUNTY BUDGET

ALLOCATION

Shall the measure, annually allocating in the County’s budget no less than ten percent (10%) of the County’s locally generated unrestrict­ed revenues in the general fund to address the disproport­ionate impact of racial injustice through community investment and alternativ­es to incarcerat­ion and prohibitin­g using those funds for carceral systems and law enforcemen­t agencies as detailed in the ordinance adopting the proposed charter amendment, be adopted?

City of Carson

Measure K- Carson Essential City Services, Emergency Response Protection

To maintain city services, such as public safety, natural disaster/public health emergency preparedne­ss; 9-1-1 emergency response, protect local drinking water/environmen­t; assist local small businesses/retain jobs; repair streets/potholes; and other general City services, shall the measure establishi­ng a ¾-cent general transactio­n and use (sales) tax providing Carson approximat­ely $12,000,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring public spending disclosure, all funds for Carson, be adopted?

City of Long Beach

Measure US - Long Beach Community Services General Purpose Oil Production Tax Increase

To provide funding for community healthcare services; air/water quality and climate change programs; increase childhood education/ youth programs; expand job training opportunit­ies; and maintain other general fund programs, shall a measure be adopted increasing Long Beach’s general oil production tax from 15¢ to maximum 30¢ per barrel, subject to annual adjustment­s, generating approximat­ely $1,600,000 annually, until ended by voters, requiring audits/ local control of funds?

Los Angeles Unified School District

Measure RR - School Upgrades And Safety Measure

To update classrooms/labs/technology for 21st century learning; implement COVID-19 facility safety standards; address school facility inequities; reduce asbestos, earthquake and water quality hazards; and replace/renovate aging school classrooms/ buildings, shall Los Angeles Unified School District’s measure be adopted authorizin­g $7,000,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying approximat­ely $0.02174 per $100 of assessed valuation, generating an estimated $329,528,000 annually until approximat­ely 2055, with independen­t audits, citizens’ oversight, no funds for administra­tive salaries?

Lomita City

Measure L- City of Lomita Local General Municipal Sales Tax Measure

To protect Lomita’s long-term financial stability; maintain City services; improve local drinking water quality; repair streets/potholes; keep parks and public areas clean/safe; maintain emergency/ public safety response; help retain local businesses; and provide other city services, shall a measure be adopted establishi­ng a ¾ cent local sales tax providing approximat­ely $1,300,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring annual independen­t financial audits with all funds benefittin­g Lomita residents?

Signal Hill City

Measure R- City of Signal Hill Financial Stability Measure

Shall a measure establishi­ng a ¾ (three quarter) cent sales tax providing an estimated $5,000,000 annually to the City’s general fund to maintain city programs such as: street, pothole, and infrastruc­ture repair, clean public areas, 9-11 emergency response, crime prevention, and other general services until ended by voters, with independen­t audits, all money used locally for Signal Hill, be adopted?

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States