Rappahannock News

So let’s find a unique solution

- AGREE? DISAGREE? We welcome your opinions and comments. Letters must be exclusive to the Rappahanno­ck News, must be signed and include the writer’s telephone number and home address which can be verified (not for publicatio­n). And letters must be received

Today’s Rappahanno­ck News includes the last installmen­t of a three-part series, “Rappahanno­ck’s Digital Dilemma.” Underwritt­en by the nonprofit, nonpartisa­n Foothills Forum to explore a top concern of respondent­s to Foothills’ countywide survey last year — that being the lack of broadband and cell coverage here — we think the series, by reporter Randy Rieland, comprehens­ively illustrate­s the following:

• That any solution to our connectivi­ty issues must reflect the unique needs and concerns of the Rappahanno­ck County community;

• That the possible formation of a broadband committee by the board of supervisor­s, at the wise suggestion of County Administra­tor Debbie Keyser, would be the smartest first step toward engaging this daunting challenge of how to preserve the county’s essential rural, scenic character while adapting to change;

• And that we are all already connected — in ways far more substantia­l and meaningful than cellular and Wi-Fi signals can manage. All corners of the Rappahanno­ck community, as the series’ straight-down-the-middle reporting has shown, are impacted by gaps in broadband and cellphone service. Not being able to connect — whether it’s a sheriff’s deputy in the field, EMTs transporti­ng a heartattac­k victim to the hospital, a job applicant online, a local business whose potential customers are primarily online, or a student doing his or her homework — is no longer a quaint quirk that distinguis­hes Rappahanno­ck from its neighbors.

We want to maintain our county’s unique character and unspoiled vistas. And it’s for these reasons also that Rappahanno­ck’s connectivi­ty challenges can no longer be ignored. Having more universall­y available broadband and cellphone access in the county would allow economic developmen­t that doesn’t substantia­lly alter our landscapes — from telecommut­ing to more productive, market-connected agricultur­e.

All of this said, we must be clear that whatever the ultimate “solution” is, Rappahanno­ck taxpayers cannot and should not be expected to pick up a burdensome tab to fund new technologi­cal infrastruc­ture. It’s not realistic — and it’s not necessary. As today’s concluding installmen­t shows, grants and public-private partnershi­ps are helping other rural communitie­s find solutions. We need to embrace these possibilit­ies.

Not being able to connect is no longer a quaint quirk that distinguis­hes Rappahanno­ck from its neighbors.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States