Protesting is in our American DNA
From Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
With many communities still struggling to manage the opioid epidemic, the last thing the nation needs is a new drug-related problem — the overprescribing of psychiatric and other medications to senior citizens.
A new report in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine raises a red flag about the trend, saying it appears to be particularly common in rural areas where patients with symptoms of mental illnesses may have less access to talk therapy and other nondrug treatments. But even in these communities, there are alternatives to medications that can and should be explored.
Between 2004 and 2013, the study found, the number of seniors taking at least three psychiatric, sleep or pain medications more than doubled. In some cases, patients received the medications even though the prescriptions were not tied to particular diagnoses and even though side effects on seniors can be particularly harsh. The study focused on medications prescribed in the offices of primary care physicians, who are the gatekeepers to the health care system, particularly in rural areas.
The findings are disconcerting because the opioid crisis was caused partly by the overprescribing of painkillers. While the study reported in JAMA Internal Medicine covered a period before the crisis broke, it underscores the need for the medical profession and health authorities to monitor prescribing practices closely.
Seniors are vulnerable to depression and related illnesses, partly because they are associated with physical maladies, such as heart failure and diabetes, afflicting their demographic. They should be encouraged to discuss mental health concerns with their doctors, and primary care physicians routinely should screen patients for depression and prescribe medications when warranted.
However, there is no reason for the prescribing to get out of hand, even in rural areas with a shortage of psychiatrists, psychologists or therapists of other kinds.
The study’s findings were no surprise to J. Todd Wahrenberger, medical director and a family medicine physician at Pittsburgh Mercy Family Health Center, who noted that many patients spend 17 minutes or less with their doctors per visit.
“Finding the time to screen for mental illness, assess the multiple dimensions of chronic pain and discuss a treatment that is not simply a pill are challenging,” he said in an email, adding that “a quick prescription becomes the solution for complex problems that require much more. For a short period of time, the patient is happy, the doctor gets to move on to the next visit, and yes, big pharma is happy, too. In the long term, however, the patient is not served and keeps coming back … for another prescription, and another and another. What we need, of course, is better integration of primary care with behavioral health that is robust and well resourced.”
If they cannot find psychiatrists or psychologists, rural practices have other options, such as hiring psychiatric nurse practitioners. Telemedicine — in which doctors communicate with other doctors or patients through the internet — is another backstop.
If a primary care physician is unsure about the proper care of a person exhibiting symptoms of mental illness, he or she should consult with a psychiatrist remotely. If the patient needs to consult with a psychiatrist or would benefit from talk therapy, that kind of care also can be arranged remotely.
Medications are the best course of treatment for some patients, but not for all. There are other options out there. If the new study is any indication, doctors and patients have to get better at pursuing them.
Dear Rev. Price: In your Feb. 16 column of the Rome News-Tribune, you railed against those who are protesting, disagreeing and igniting “the fires of insurrection.” You plead for these rabble-rousers to “give harmony a chance” and to learn to disagree without becoming disagreeable.
Rev. Price, we are Americans. We the People not only protested when we were taxed without representation, we revolted against it. We the People not only held rallies and protests against slavery, we fought a bloody civil war to get rid of it. We the People have lobbied, protested and demonstrated against Jim Crow laws,
Email letters to the editor to MColombo@RN-T.com or submit them to the Rome News-Tribune, 305 E. Sixth Ave., Rome, GA 30162. inequality in education and opportunity, environmental ruin, and all forms of discrimination against minorities and women. We the People protested against a questionable war in Vietnam and the unquestionably stupid invasion of Iraq in 2003. We are loud and often disagreeable.
This right is so precious that it is enshrined in the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. We the American People do not believe in the divine right of presidents any more than we believe in the divine right of kings. Your attempt to discourage us from speaking out, given our history, is naive and misguided. When the administration of the government is not one elected by most Americans, and that administration resembles a bull in a china shop, you can bet that We the People are not going to be quiet about it. It is not only our right, it is part of our American DNA.
Deal with it. Paul F. Culotta Rome