Rome News-Tribune

Pitino out at Louisville

- By Gary B. Graves Associated Press Sports Writer

LOUISVILLE, Ky. — Rick Pitino has been able to roam the sidelines as Louisville’s iconic men’s basketball coach, even defiantly at times, holding onto his job amid a series of highly embarrassi­ng missteps off the court.

Things looked bleak this time around, with a seemingly inevitable departure looming in the weeks since the latest scandal became public. But even after the school was linked to a federal bribery investigat­ion, no one completely counted Pitino out. Not until Monday. The university had seen enough and decided to finally cut ties with the Hall of Famer. The decision was unanimous. Louisville’s Athletic Associatio­n officially fired Pitino on Monday, nearly three weeks after the school acknowledg­ed that Pitino’s program is being investigat­ed as part of a federal corruption probe.

The associatio­n, which oversees Louisville’s sports programs and is composed of trustees, faculty, students and administra­tors, voted unanimousl­y to oust the longtime Cardinals coach following a board meeting. The ULAA even heard from Pitino’s attorney, who made the case that his client “could not have known” about activities alleged in the federal investigat­ion.

Not long after Steve Pence’s 45-minute address to the ULAA, the associatio­n announced its decision after five hours of meetings. Pitino has $44 million remaining in salary and bonuses in a contract extension through the 2025-26 season. He was scheduled to earn a base salary of $5.1 million.

“We listened carefully to what they said, we read carefully everything they gave us,” university interim President Greg Postel said of the legal team’s presentati­on. “At the end of the conversati­on we felt that our initial decision to begin the process of terminatio­n for cause was still in the best interests of the university. And that’s why the resolution was put forth and passed.”

Pence said later in a text to The Associated Press that the decision was “disappoint­ing but not unexpected.”

The associatio­n had authorized Postel to begin the process of firing Pitino for cause on Oct. 2 after Postel placed the coach on unpaid administra­tive leave Sept. 27. At that time Postel also placed athletic director Tom Jurich’s on paid administra­tive leave. Trustees are expected to make a decision on Jurich’s future later this week.

Also Monday, the ULAA approved the hirings of acting AD Vince Tyra and Padgett, who received a one-year contract through Sept. 29, 2018. Padgett will earn $400,000 in salary plus incentives, and received a broadcast deal for another $400,000.

However, Pitino’s status was the board’s most anticipate­d personnel decision.

The move Monday officially ended Pitino’s 16-year tenure with the program, a run in which he compiled a 416-143 record — including 25-9 last season and winning the 2013 NCAA championsh­ip. But his success on the court was tarnished by off-court incidents.

Pitino, 65, is not named in court complaints in the federal probe but Postel said in a disciplina­ry letter that the allegation­s violated his contract. Ten people that have been arrested in the corruption case, including four college assistant coaches and an Adidas executive.

Pence had contended that Louisville rushed to judgment and said Monday that Pitino should be retained.

“The coach did not engage in any of this activity, he didn’t know about the activity,” Pence said. “I think we made a very compelling case to the board, I think they listened attentivel­y and we’ll just have to wait and see what they say.”

Pence entered the meeting carrying a poster board for presentati­on to the ULAA. The attorney later distribute­d a detailed 55-page document that included letters of support for the coach, including one from David Padgett, who was named as Pitino’s interim replacemen­t on Sept. 29.

The statements also included an affidavit from Pitino in which the coach said he “had no part — active, passive or through willful ignorance in the conspiracy described in the complaint.”

There was also a polygraph result in the documents indicating that Pitino was not deceptive in answering that he did not pay signee Brian Bowen’s family or knew that Bowen’s family was paid.

Neither the book of documents nor the presentati­on by Pitino’s legal team swayed the board.

“We just needed some to digest it, read through the materials and make sure we understood all that he (Pence) had presented,” Postel said.

The board’s vote Monday was expected but still marked a quick end at Louisville for Pitino, whose career with the Cardinals has been marred the past two years with various incidents.

Pitino and Louisville are appealing NCAA penalties levied in June following an investigat­ion into a sex scandal that emerged in October 2015. Escort Katina Powell alleged in a book that former Cardinals staffer Andre McGee hired her and other dancers to strip and have sex with players and recruits in the team’s dormitory from 2010-14.

The NCAA placed Louisville on four years’ probation and has ordered the vacation of up to 123 victories over that period, which includes the 2013 title. Pitino received a five-game suspension.

Louisville’s involvemen­t in the federal probe was the last straw for the university. Postel wrote in an Oct. 3 disciplina­ry letter to Pitino that the action arose out of his conduct over a period of years and noted his involvemen­t in the recent scandals.

“Your involvemen­t in these recent scandals cannot be considered isolated events,” Postel wrote. “Instead, they are illustrati­ve of a pattern and practice of inappropri­ate behavior.”

It all led to an unceremoni­ous end to the Pitino era.

 ?? File, Timothy D. Easley / AP ?? Louisville’s Athletic Associatio­n officially fired coach Rick Pitino on Monday after acknowledg­ing that its men’s basketball program is being investigat­ed as part of a federal corruption probe.
File, Timothy D. Easley / AP Louisville’s Athletic Associatio­n officially fired coach Rick Pitino on Monday after acknowledg­ing that its men’s basketball program is being investigat­ed as part of a federal corruption probe.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States