Rome News-Tribune

The $2.8M prize that got away

- By Ben Finley Associated Press

OCEAN CITY, Md. — Phil Heasley caught the fish of his life, but the $2.8 million in tournament prize money got away.

Heasley reeled in a 6-foot white marlin last year off Maryland’s coast. But in a sign of how concerned some big money tournament­s are about cheating, officials made him and his crew take lie detector tests. The officials said all four men failed.

Heasley is now in a pro- tracted court battle over the winnings and his crew’s reputation, pitting their integrity against that of one of the world’s most lucrative angling contests.

The white-haired CEO of a financial software company had motored with his crew into the Atlantic before sunrise on a Tuesday in August in his 68-foot fishing boat, the Kallianass­a, to compete in the 2016 White Marlin Open.

About 65 miles out, they zeroed in on a fast-moving school of skipjack tuna, according to transcript­s from the nine-day trial.

One of the mates quickly hooked a marlin. The captain maneuvered the boat and Heasley worked the reel.

The avid fisherman from Naples, Florida, said he fought the famously acrobatic species for about 10 minutes. The blue-finned fish — whose snout resembles a fencing rapier — was “running like mad” and leaping to dislodge the hook.

Hanging from the tournament scale in Ocean City, the white marlin turned out to be relatively scrawny, weighing in at 76.5 pounds — not far over the 70-pound qualifying weight and nearly 20 pounds lighter than the 2015 winner.

“I did not think that we had a fish that was going to win some great big amount of money,” Heasley

said on the witness stand.

Three days later, the tournament deemed it the only qualifying white marlin of the five-day open.

The total prize was $2,818,662.

Heasley planned to give half to the crew, a lifechangi­ng gift.

But there was one more step: Heasley had to pass a lie detector test.

Tournament­s have employed polygraphs for decades. Sometimes they’re used to settle disputes. No accusation­s had been made against the Kallianass­a, but polygraphs are standard at the White Marlin Open.

Heasley, 68, had competed in dozens of tournament­s, once winning $800,000. But this was his first White Marlin Open and his first polygraph.

In a hotel conference room, the examiner measured his heartbeat, breathing and perspirati­on and asked, “Did you commit any tournament violations?” Similar questions followed.

The results were inconclusi­ve. Another test was required. The unsuspecti­ng and hung-over captain, David Morris, had to be tested too. The examiner said Morris indicated “deception” during his exam. File, Larry Jock / Coastal Fisherman via AP

Phil Heasley (second from left) and his team are now engaged in a protracted appeal in the courts to try to claim the $2.8 million prize denied them after a 9-day trial.

The men still posed with a promotiona­l check at the award ceremony. But the actual money was being withheld, they were told, pending Heasley’s second polygraph and tests for the two mates. No one passed. Tournament officials denied the prize. Heasley refused to sign a release of the winnings. The tournament asked a court to intervene.

Winners from other fishing categories joined in the litigation, claiming they were entitled to the money. They accused the Kallianass­a of dropping its fishing lines before 8:30 a.m., a rule violation.

At trial, Heasley’s lawyers questioned the accuracy of polygraph tests, and criticized the tournament’s exams.

The judge ruled against Heasley in June, writing that Heasley had agreed to the open’s terms.

The judge also sided with the other anglers over the Kallianass­a’s fishing start time, citing discrepanc­ies among the crew’s accounts and other evidence.

The case is now on appeal. In a statement to The Associated Press, Heasley said he’s fighting for the decency of the sport.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States