Rome News-Tribune

Probe into ‘discarded’ ballots now campaign outrage fuel

- By Christina A. Cassidy and Mark Scolforo

HARRISBURG, Pa. — The news release from a U.S. attorney in Pennsylvan­ia was provocativ­e: Nine mailed-in military ballots had been “discarded” by the local election office in a swing county of one of the most important presidenti­al battlegrou­nd states.

All of them were marked for President Donald Trump, it said. Then came another news release with key details changed — the presidenti­al choice was unknown on two of the ballots because they had been resealed — but still little explanatio­n of what had happened and whether investigat­ors believed a criminal act had occurred.

Despite the informatio­n vacuum, the White House press secretary told reporters “ballots for the president” had been “cast aside.” The Trump campaign’s rapid response arm pushed out the release from Trump’s own Justice Department under the headline “Democrats are trying to steal the election” — ignoring the fact that the local government, Luzerne County, is controlled by Republican­s. Conservati­ve voices used the news release as rocket fuel to amplify the investigat­ion on social media.

Thursday’s kerfuffle and accompanyi­ng internet outrage over a handful of ballots is likely a taste of what’s to come in the month left before the presidenti­al election, which is being held amid a global pandemic that has triggered a wave of absentee ballot requests as Trump continues to launch unsubstant­iated attacks on mail voting.

It was Trump, after being briefed on the case by Attorney General William Barr, who first revealed publicly that the discarded ballots had been cast for him. He did so in an interview earlier Thursday with Fox News Radio in which he used the investigat­ion to further sow doubt about mailin voting. The radio interview was hours before the U.S. attorney’s office in Pennsylvan­ia issued its news release about the probe to reporters.

“If past is prologue, we will see more,” said Wendy Weiser, an elections expert and director of the democracy program at the Brennan Center for Justice. “We are in an unpreceden­ted situation where a sitting president of the United States and a candidate for reelection is and has long been actively seeking to undermine the election and discredit it.”

Weiser said it was important that officials provide detailed informatio­n about any voting issues that arise, which happen every election cycle. For instance, officials with the U.S. Postal Service said this week they are investigat­ing a report that an unknown number of ballots were among other mail found in a ditch near a highway intersecti­on in Wisconsin, another presidenti­al battlegrou­nd state.

Officials have so far released little informatio­n in that case, including whether the ballots were blank and on their way to voters or if they had been completed and were being returned to the local election office.

Experts say the lack of informatio­n in these cases opens the door to speculatio­n and conspiracy theories.

By Friday, more details had emerged in the Pennsylvan­ia case. Federal officials were considerin­g whether a recently hired, temporary election worker may have mishandled the ballots. Aside from the unknowns about the investigat­ion itself, questions persist over how the Justice Department handled the matter.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States