Rome News-Tribune

Election law controvers­y sinks sports betting in Ga. legislatur­e

- By Dave Williams

Legislatio­n aimed at legalizing online sports betting in Georgia is a casualty of the controvers­ial election law overhaul majority Republican­s pushed through the General Assembly last week.

A constituti­onal amendment asking voters whether to bring legal sports betting to Georgia and a separate “enabling” bill outlining how the industry would operate failed to reach the floor of the state House of Representa­tives on the final night of this year’s legislativ­e session.

Both measures had cleared the Georgia Senate early last month.

Supporters blamed passage of the omnibus election reform bill for poisoning the well for Democrats, whose support was critical to passing sports betting.

The Georgia chapter of the NAACP released a statement on Wednesday urging lawmakers not to vote for any legalized gambling legislatio­n.

“That killed it,” said state Rep. Ron Stephens, R-savannah, who was carrying the sports betting legislatio­n in the House. “After that, a lot of issues fell by the wayside.”

Stephens and other Republican­s worked to win Democrats’ support for sports betting by agreeing to dedicate a portion of the proceeds to needbased scholarshi­ps, a key priority for Democrats.

But the goodwill between GOP supporters of sports betting and Democratic lawmakers faded after Gov. Brian Kemp signed an election reform bill Democrats labeled as voter suppressio­n. The Georgia NAACP is among the groups challengin­g the legislatio­n in a federal lawsuit.

“If they expect to earn our support on corporate issues that will make rich people wealthier, our expectatio­n is that they, too, work with us on uplifting our community through meaningful policy objectives,” the Rev. James Woodall, state president of the Georgia NAACP, wrote in a statement.

Senate passage of sports betting had begun building momentum for the legislatio­n in the House. It marked the first time in a decade of trying that supporters of legalized gambling had gotten a bill through either of the two chambers.

But the tide appeared to be turning by Wednesday morning, when Sen. Jeff Mullis, chief sponsor of the sports betting measures, took to the Senate floor to complain that House Democrats were blocking his legislatio­n.

“They are leaving tens of millions of dollars on the table for need-based (scholarshi­ps) funding for people who really need it,” said Mullis, Rchickamau­ga.

Rick Lackey, an Atlanta-based real estate developer behind three proposed casino resorts scattered across Georgia, suggested sports betting failed because the legislatio­n didn’t include legalizing casino gambling.

He said casinos would bring in far more tax revenue for need-based scholarshi­ps, health care and other uses the state might have for gambling proceeds than sports betting. Also, online sports betting wouldn’t create jobs, while casinos would generate thousands of temporary constructi­on jobs and permanent jobs after mixed-use casino resorts open for business, he said.

“It’s like comparing penny pitching to Blackjack,” Lackey said.

Lackey pointed out that a constituti­onal amendment to legalize sports betting, casinos and parimutuel betting on horse racing is still alive in the Georgia House for considerat­ion next year.

But Stephens said he’d rather see the General Assembly pursue sports betting first.

“Sports betting is supposed to be the easy one,” he said. “It would give us momentum as we move into the other stuff.”

“They are leaving tens of millions of dollars on the table for needbased (scholarshi­ps) funding for people who really need it.” Sen. Jeff Mullis, R-chickamaug­a

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States