Rome News-Tribune

Pressure rises on online retailers to fight fakes

- By Gopal Ratnam CQ-Roll Call

From clothes and shoes to electronic­s and even aircraft engine parts, online retail sites and social media marketplac­es are awash in counterfei­t products, tricking consumers and companies into buying the fake goods.

Of 13,000 online consumers surveyed in 17 countries by the Michigan State University Center for AntiCounte­rfeiting and Product Protection, nearly 3 out of 4 reported having bought counterfei­t products.

The fakes go beyond simple retail products. The Federal Aviation Administra­tion warned aircraft engine makers in September that a Londonbase­d company called AOG Technics sold unauthoriz­ed parts by forging documentat­ion of their authentici­ty. The agency asked airlines to inspect their aircraft to ensure they had genuine parts.

Against that backdrop, consumer advocates and legal experts are urging Congress to pass legislatio­n that would make online platforms liable for dangers posed by counterfei­t goods by putting the retailers on par with brick-and-mortar stores.

Congress already took a step toward holding online marketplac­es accountabl­e by including legislatio­n in the fiscal 2023 appropriat­ions act that requires online retailers to collect, verify and disclose informatio­n about third-party sellers on their sites.

That transparen­cy law, known as the Inform Act, went into force in June. The Federal Trade Commission has said the agency and states “have authority to enforce the new statute and online marketplac­es that run afoul of the law could be subject to steep financial penalties.”

Now, Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee’s panel on intellectu­al property, and Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., the panel’s top Republican, are pursuing legislatio­n that would hold the platforms liable for the sale of counterfei­ts.

Not only do such fake goods harm consumers, but they also affect companies whose brands and trademarks are being duplicated, said James Bikoff, a partner in the law firm of Smith, Gambrell & Russell LLP in Washington.

“The two acts together, one for transparen­cy and one for liability, are needed, and they tie into the two major efforts to curtail the distributi­on of counterfei­t products in our country right now,” Bikoff said in an interview.

At an Oct. 3 subcommitt­ee hearing, Coons said the legislatio­n would open “platforms to liability if counterfei­t goods affecting health and safety are sold on the platforms, the same liability brick-andmortar retailers have been subject to for decades.”

The legislatio­n also would require “brand owners to provide platforms with notice of their trademarks and a critical point of contact” to help online retailers figure out the real from the fake, Coons said.

Counterfei­ts are everywhere, Tillis said at the hearing, recounting the example of a fake bicycle helmet branded as Specialize­d that cracked when a 180-pound person jumped on it from a 1-foot height.

“So I think that’s just one example,” Tillis said. “We hear about them in automobile parts and airplane parts. You see this in children’s toys that the official version may be safe (but) the counterfei­t version is very dangerous. There’s no question that we’ve got to fix this problem.”

ONLINE RETAILERS WANT CHANGES

The proposed legislatio­n faces opposition from the tech industry.

Matt Schruers, president of the Computer & Communicat­ions Industry Associatio­n, which represents Amazon. com Inc., eBay Inc., Meta Platforms Inc. and other platforms, told lawmakers that online retailers share the goal of preventing counterfei­ts but that the bill in its current form places “major new burdens and liabilitie­s on sellers of all sizes while requiring no significan­t new contributi­on from brand owners.”

Schruers told lawmakers that the bill’s definition of health and safety products “would encompass virtually every product in today’s consumer household.”

The Michigan State study, published in September, found that 68 percent of those who bought a fake product on a social media site did so on Facebook. A spokesman for Facebook parent Meta said the company’s policies prohibit trademark violations and that the company has built technology to eliminate counterfei­t products on its site. Almost all counterfei­t takedowns in 2022 on Facebook stemmed from the use of those technologi­es, the spokesman said in an email.

Amazon’s anti-counterfei­t policy says products offered on the site “must be authentic.” The sale of fake products and failure to abide by the platform’s rules is punishable by a ban on the platform and possible referral to law enforcemen­t. EBay and Meta Platforms’ Facebook have similar policies.

Yet counterfei­ts still proliferat­e.

A spokesman for the Senate Judiciary Committee didn’t respond to emails asking how the lawmakers intend to proceed with the legislatio­n.

In the absence of specific provisions addressing the responsibi­lity of online retailers, the U.S. legal system continues to make a distinctio­n between physical stores and online marketplac­es, Kari Kammel, director of the Michigan State anti-counterfei­ting center, told lawmakers at the subcommitt­ee hearing.

Kammel cited a 2010 case, Tiffany v. eBay, in which a federal court decided “that it was unreasonab­le for an e-commerce platform to be able to look through their own platform to find these postings” of fake products.

But with the evolution of technology and the arrival of artificial intelligen­ce systems, “it’s no longer unreasonab­le for a platform to be able to see what’s on its own platform,” Kammel told lawmakers. They should be able to proactivel­y vet sellers, their postings and the images uploaded “to make sure once something’s posted it’s actually safe for the consumer to purchase.”

Red Points, a company with offices in New York and Barcelona, employs AI to help brands identify and report counterfei­t products on online marketplac­es, said Daniel Shapiro, who heads brand relationsh­ips and strategic partnershi­ps at the firm.

Online marketplac­es like Amazon, Alibaba, eBay and others may collective­ly see as many as “2 to 3 billion” new items listed by third-party sellers each day, Shapiro said in an interview. Small and large companies alike find it hard to employ a sufficient number of trademark and intellectu­al property specialist­s to identify and report counterfei­ts in such a large volume of products, he said.

Instead, brands in fields of fashion, electronic­s, sports and others that contract with Red Points share details on their trademarks, logos, packaging particular­s, shipping locations, cost of manufactur­ing and other proprietar­y informatio­n.

The company uses artificial intelligen­ce tools to scan as many as 35 million online listings daily to identify potential fakes, Shapiro said. When a fake is discovered, the company sends a notice to the online platform on behalf of the brand.

Even with technologi­cal solutions, “nobody’s going to stop counterfei­ting. … It has been with us since the Middle Ages,” Bikoff said. Fake products are going to be around for “as far in the future I can see, but what we need to do is have measures that are reasonable, that prevent platforms from ignoring the safety and health risks of counterfei­ting.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States