San Antonio Express-News (Sunday)

Legislatur­e could tackle urgent issues with annual sessions

- By Lyle Larson Lyle Larson, R-San Antonio, represents part of San Antonio in the Texas House of Representa­tives.

The pandemic wrought by COVID-19 has brought clarity about so many things for folks across the world. Here in Texas, it has become clear the Legislatur­e must be able to act more quickly than once every two years.

When the World Health Organizati­on deemed the spread of COVID-19 a global pandemic in March, the Legislatur­e was nine long months away from convening for the 87th legislativ­e session.

During that time, we missed opportunit­ies to address all aspects of the pandemic’s impact on Texans. Everything from mask mandates, to food insecurity, hospital capacity, shutdowns and public education challenges.

Due to the archaic schedule set forth in the Texas Constituti­on, the Legislatur­e was powerless to act, and instead the sole responsibi­lity of addressing the pandemic fell on our governor. The Legislatur­e is intended to act in times like these, but just as it has many times in the past, it will show up late to address problems that have waited far too long for solutions.

No successful organizati­on with a $250 billion biennial budget and a GDP of $1.6 trillion can be actively managed for just five months every two years. No successful business, country or even 46 other U.S. states operate this way. But Texas does.

When our state government was getting started, this made sense. Back then, it took more than eight days to travel by stagecoach from Amarillo to Austin. Understand­ably, legislator­s from far-flung parts of the state had little desire to make the arduous trip annually. In 2020, however, the same trek from Amarillo takes eight hours by car and even less time by plane.

Now, there are no discernibl­e reasons to continue to meet just once every two years, letting important state business languish while we wait for the pages of the calendar to fall.

In the past few years alone, our state has faced catastroph­es and events that demanded an urgent response. But the Legislatur­e happened to be out of session, leaving these issues largely unaddresse­d.

For example, after Hurricane Harvey wreaked havoc on our state, causing some of the worst flooding Texans have ever experience­d, the problem wasn’t addressed for more than two years, when voters approved a flood mitigation strategy, Propositio­n 8, in November 2019.

Entering my first legislativ­e session in 2011, we faced a $25 billion shortfall. Ultimately, we cut $5.4 billion in education funding. If the Legislatur­e met more often, it would have had the opportunit­y to make decisions sooner based on market conditions and revenue projection­s, possibly softening the blow of the drastic cuts.

The Legislatur­e could have real-time votes of confidence with regard to its leadership when controvers­y arises. Revenue projection­s could be made for a 12-month period, instead of 24, making our budgeting process significan­tly more accurate. Oil price fluctuatio­ns and other events that impact the state budget can be monitored and addressed the way they are by other states, countries and businesses in the modern world.

Those who argue a biennial session schedule means less government aren’t necessaril­y correct. Given only 140 days every other year entices legislator­s to file as many bills as they can, knowing they won’t have another chance for two years. Some argue that tying our own hands is irresponsi­ble government — this seems more correct.

The Legislatur­e should meet for 70 days every year beginning in mid-March and finishing in May. The cost to run the Legislatur­e would be the same — and we would be light-years ahead from an effectiven­ess and efficiency standpoint. We would forgo 60 days of resolution­s and recognitio­ns in January and February, allowing the Legislatur­e to get straight to business with focus and purpose.

Some will say we can utilize the special session process to deal with problems that occur outside the regular session; however, special sessions are costly and many governors have been reluctant to call them. If the Legislatur­e met every year, the need for special sessions would be practicall­y eliminated.

The stagecoach in 1845 may have been the reason we started meeting every other year, but this approach no longer can be justified as the Legislatur­e runs the 12th-largest economy in the world. The Texas Constituti­on has been amended hundreds of times. It’s time to amend it once more to allow for annual regular sessions. The stockholde­rs of Texas deserve a timely and responsibl­e approach to the matters at hand. Let’s give them that option.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States