San Antonio Express-News (Sunday)
Workers deserve more than minimum wage
For more than a century, Catholic social teaching has advocated not for a minimum wage but for a living wage for workers. Sadly, however, the U.S. Congress cannot even increase the minimum wage because of parliamentary rules and Republican opposition.
A living wage, according to Pope Leo XIII in his 1891 encyclical Rerum Novarum, would be enough to provide for a family’s basic living expenses — food, housing and other needs. In other words, it should keep a family out of poverty.
The U.S. bishops proposed a universal living wage in their 1919 Program for Reconstruction, years before a minimum wage became part of the New Deal.
The federal minimum wage today is $7.25 an hour, which amounts to $290 a week for a 40-hour workweek, or $15,080 a year, which is far from a living wage.
I challenge anyone who opposes increasing the minimum wage — including members of Congress — to try to live off those amounts during Lent. What for most would be an unbearable penance is daily life for 1.6 million workers who earned at or below the federal minimum wage in 2019.
The annual income for a person receiving the minimum wage is just above the poverty level for a single person ($12,880), but it is far below the poverty level for a family of two ($17,400) or four ($26,500). Thus, the current minimum wage does not come close to meeting the requirements of a living wage.
The federal minimum wage has not increased since July 2009, and in terms of purchasing power, the current minimum wage is less than it was in 1968 — $11.76 in 2019 dollars.
The Biden administration wants to raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour, which opponents say would hurt small businesses during the COVID-19 recession. But a careful reading of the House bill shows that the increase would would not reach $15 an hour until four years after the bill is passed, by which time the pandemic recession will be a distant memory.
For many years, economists argued that if wages were increased, it would mean fewer jobs. This followed the classical economic view that when prices go up, consumption of any item, including labor, goes down. More
recent economic studies have found these fears were overblown. True, some jobs might disappear, but higher salaries also have a ripple effect as this money is spent in workers’ neighborhoods.
The Congressional Budget Office predicts that increasing the minimum wage to $15 an hour would improve the lives of 27.3 million low-wage workers, including 1.3 million who will be
lifted out of poverty. On the downside, it believes that 1.3 million workers will lose their jobs. Other economists believe these numbers are overly pessimistic.
State and city increases in the minimum wage have not led to the dire consequences predicted by their opponents. We must also ask, are these low-paying jobs worth saving?
Attempts to increase the minimum wage failed when the parliamentarian ruled that the increase would not qualify as a budgetary item under Senate rules and therefore could not be included in the Biden $1.9 trillion stimulus package. Including it in the stimulus bill would have allowed passage by a majority vote. Any attempt to enact it separately will meet Republican opposition that will be able to kill the increase with a filibuster.
Republicans are doing this despite the strong support that increasing the minimum wage has in the country. According to the Pew Research Center, twothirds of Americans support increasing the minimum wage to $15 an hour.
More states, like Florida, have raised their minimum wages, but we need a Federal standard so that regions that try to help workers are not penalized.
The Biden plan is not radical; it is very conservative. Forcing someone to work at poverty wages is simply another form of slavery. People, including single parents, should be able to support their families with their wages. It is past time to move the minimum wage toward a living wage.