San Antonio Express-News

TOMLINSON

- Tomlinson writes commentary about business, economics and policy. twitter.com/cltomlinso­n chris.tomlinson@chron.com

Even more people make the drive.

Environmen­talists should leap at the chance to move people out of fossil-fuel vehicles and onto electric-powered trains. As the amount of renewable energy on the Texas grid grows, the cleaner train travel will become.

Raised railways will take away agricultur­al land and could cause flooding if not correctly engineered. Laying track across the state will create local headaches, and some landowners have already promised more lawsuits. Anytime humans change the landscape, there will be consequenc­es.

Moving people onto rails, though, will reduce demand for additional highway lanes and airport runways. Train travel is considerab­ly less polluting than airlines or autos.

The more significan­t longterm

benefit is the creation of new businesses and investment­s. Texas Central has hired Italian constructi­on giant Salini Impregilo to lay the high-tech rails. It will purchase the trains from Central Japan Railway and contract Spanish rail operator Renfe to run the show.

Those companies will hire hundreds of Texas subcontrac­tors and workers, and when other states build their highspeed rail, Texas companies will take their newly acquired expertise across the country.

Unfortunat­ely, a bunch of curmudgeon­s and entrenched incumbents want to prevent Texans from seizing these opportunit­ies. They fear change and don’t like competitio­n.

Farmers and ranchers say they do not want electric trains whizzing past their property, complainin­g it will ruin the character of their rural communitie­s.

Clairvoyan­t critics argue not enough people will use the system

to justify the disruption or expense. Even though Texas Central does not rely on taxpayer money, unlike California’s High-Speed Rail project, fiscal hawks predict that if the company goes bankrupt, it will go to Congress with hat in hand.

Previous generation­s made the same arguments against the Interstate Highway System, which happens to rely on fuel taxes. The naysayers were wrong then and they are wrong now.

Most days, I’d expect Republican­s to rejoice when a private firm offered to invest billions in Texas. They’d be thrilled to demonstrat­e that private enterprise in Texas can outperform a public-financed California high-speed rail project.

Sadly, Republican lawmakers are not as committed to limited regulation and free enterprise as they claim, caving in to the regressive demands of rural GOP primary voters. U.S. Rep. Kevin Brady, R-The Woodlands, is

trying to derail the project, and state Rep. Ben Leman, R-Brenham, is spreading disinforma­tion produced by activist groups with hidden funders.

This is another case of hypocritic­al NIMBYism. The same people who support pipelines and highways cutting through other people’s private property get worked up when Texas Central tries to leverage rights granted to railroads since the 19th century.

No state in the nation is better suited than Texas for high-speed rail. Real estate developers, airlines and auto dealership­s have killed past projects to protect their profits. Let’s not let those forces retard Texas’ chance to become a national leader in the transporta­tion mode of the future.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States