San Antonio Express-News

Senate bill would ban bank discrimina­tion

- By Emily Flitter

Democrats in Congress have introduced legislatio­n that would make it illegal for banks and other financial firms to discrimina­te against their customers because of their race, religion, sexual orientatio­n and other characteri­stics — an effort meant to close a loophole in the Civil Rights Act highlighte­d in a New York Times report in June.

The Fair Access to Financial Services Act, introduced Wednesday by members of the Senate Banking Committee, would explicitly outlaw discrimina­tion against bank customers. Currently, it is legal for banks and some other businesses to treat some customers differentl­y as long as those customers eventually receive the services they are seeking. That means, in practical terms, that banks can racially profile their customers and delay their transactio­ns, or ask them to take extra steps to prove their legitimacy, without risking penalties as long as they eventually do business with those customers.

The loophole stems from the specificit­y of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which lists the kinds of businesses — including movie theaters, restaurant­s and hotels — where discrimina­tion is prohibited. Courts have ruled that the law does not apply to any businesses not on the list. That leaves customers who say they have been mistreated with little recourse, especially in states like Georgia, where there are no statewide anti-discrimina­tion laws.

The bill stipulates that “all persons shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges and accommodat­ions of financial institutio­ns.” It is sponsored by Sens. Sherrod Brown of Ohio, Tina Smith of Minnesota, Cory Booker and Robert Menendez of New Jersey, Elizabeth Warren of Massachuse­tts and Chris Van Hollen of Maryland.

The bill was written after the Times described the ways in which Black bank customers have been treated with suspicion and hostility while trying to do basic banking business. In one instance, a man seeking to withdraw cash from his Wells Fargo account to buy a car was turned away by a manager who threatened to call police. In another, Wells Fargo employees called police on a woman trying to cash a $200 check.

Because of the loophole in federal law, customers who experience discrimina­tion can rely only on state protection­s when they seek justice.

“Too many Black and brown Americans experience racial profiling and unequal treatment when trying to access services at banks and other financial institutio­ns,” Brown said in an announceme­nt of the bill emailed to The Times. “Victims of discrimina­tion are not even able to hold financial institutio­ns accountabl­e — it is shameful.”

The 2 ½-page bill lays out what bank customers who experience discrimina­tion can do about it: Ask a federal court to order the bank or financial institutio­n to cease the mistreatme­nt and recoup lawyers' fees from the institutio­n if the court rules in their favor.

“Our legislatio­n would be a clear and comprehens­ive statement that discrimina­tion has no place in our financial system,” Smith said in the announceme­nt.

The bill has been endorsed by civil rights groups like the NAACP, Unidosus and the National Urban League, according to the announceme­nt.

Two Democrats on the House Financial Services Committee, Reps. Hank Johnson of Georgia and Joyce Beatty of Ohio, will introduce a complement­ary bill, according to the Senate announceme­nt.

 ?? Dreamstime / TNS ?? Wells Fargo is twice accused of threatenin­g to call police on people trying to either withdraw cash from their accounts or trying to cash a $200 check.
Dreamstime / TNS Wells Fargo is twice accused of threatenin­g to call police on people trying to either withdraw cash from their accounts or trying to cash a $200 check.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States