San Antonio Express-News

Trump heaps more ugly on his exit

- @RichLowry

RICH LOWRY

No one expected Donald Trump to handle a defeat in the 2020 election well.

It was predictabl­e he’d deny that he really lost and allege the vote was rigged, that he’d tweet wild and misleading things, and that he’d lash out in absurd and sophomoric

ways.

All that was inevitable. What’s been more disturbing is how far he and his allies have been willing to push it, not content only to delegitimi­ze the election but actively seeking to invalidate it.

This was the vista opened by the refusal of Republican canvassers in Wayne County — which includes Detroit — to certify the county’s election results on Tuesday, before relenting.

Trump’s central failing as president has been his inability to distinguis­h between his personal interest and the public interest. No president in memory has made less of an effort to allow the institutio­n of the presidency to shape him and to conform to the constraint­s it imposes. Instead, he’s acted as if he’s the host of “Celebrity Apprentice,” merely relocated to 1600 Pennsylvan­ia Ave. and with more Twitter followers.

As a personal matter, his handling of the election has been a runaway success. For him, the potential downside of elected office was courting the humiliatio­n of defeat experience­d by almost every major politician at some point in their careers. It would have been better if Trump had avoided this by actually winning the election (and doing the innumerabl­e easy things he could have done to help his cause), but successful­ly branding the election as stolen is second best for Trump’s own purposes.

What does he care if it comes at the cost of trampling the precedent of graceful exits by defeated U.S. presidents going back to John Adams in 1800?

Given how close the election was in key battlegrou­nds, and how the vote count shifted against Trump after election night, it was inevitable Republican­s would have suspicions about the process. But it’s wrong for Trump to fuel the doubts with a constant flow of bad informatio­n and conspiracy theories — just as elected Democrats and the media never should have played up the cockamamie idea that the Russians stole the election in 2016.

Elected Republican­s have been giving Trump lots of running room, on grounds that he should have the chance to ferret out fraud and to have his day in court.

This is fine as far as it goes, so long as results that withstand scrutiny are honored.

In Wayne County, the discrepanc­ies that motivated the Republican canvassers were vanishingl­y small. According to the Detroit Free Press, the

majority of Election Day precincts and absent voter boards with mismatches had discrepanc­ies of three or fewer votes, amounting to roughly 387 votes. Trump lost Michigan by about 150,000 votes — and slightly overperfor­med in Wayne County.

According to Robert Costa of the Washington Post, Rudy Giuliani’s endgame is to block enough certificat­ions to get the election into the House. If this is an accurate rendering of the thinking, it makes zero sense.

The House takes up a presidenti­al election if no one gets a majority of the appointed electors; in other words, a candidate can be below 270 electors and still win. This means that the Trump team could block the certificat­ions in Michigan, Pennsylvan­ia, Wisconsin, Georgia, Arizona and Nevada — and still lose to Joe Biden, 233-232.

To go down this route, the Trump team needs to pile another implausibi­lity on top of blocking certificat­ions and have the legislatur­es appoint Trump electors in stark defiance of the election results — precipitat­ing a constituti­onal crisis that Trump would ultimately lose, and deserve to.

Trump has such a strong hold on the GOP base that Republican­s feel the need to play along with his deep-seated inability to admit defeat. The slogan of counting every “legal vote” is a safe harbor that all Republican­s can hew to, but it should go without saying that it must mean counting — and certifying — valid votes for Joe Biden.

 ?? Anna Moneymaker / New York Times ?? President Donald Trump has always been unable to distinguis­h between his personal interest and the public interest. That’s manifest in his corrosive attacks on the election.
Anna Moneymaker / New York Times President Donald Trump has always been unable to distinguis­h between his personal interest and the public interest. That’s manifest in his corrosive attacks on the election.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States