Unemployment aid is set to lapse today
WASHINGTON — A day before expanded unemployment benefits were set to lapse for millions of struggling Americans, President Donald Trump expressed more criticism Friday of a $900 billion pandemic relief bill that was awaiting his signature and would extend them.
The sprawling economic relief package that Congress passed with overwhelming bipartisan support would extend the amount of time that people can collect unemployment benefits until March and revive supplemental unemployment benefits for millions of Americans at $300 a week on top of the usual state benefit.
If Trump signed the bill Friday evening or sometime today states would still need time to reprogram their computer systems to account for the new law, according to Michele Evermore of the National Employment Law Project, but unemployed workers still would be able to claim the benefits.
Further delays could prove more costly. States cannot pay out benefits for weeks that begin before the bill is signed, meaning that if the president does not sign the bill by today benefits will not restart until the first week of January. But they will still end in mid-March, effectively trimming the extension to 10 weeks from 11.
Trump blindsided lawmakers Tuesday when he hinted he may veto the measure, which he decided at the last minute was unsatisfactory. The most pressing issue prompted by the president’s delay was the fate of unemployment benefits. At least a temporary lapse in those benefits is now inevitable.
The country is also facing a looming government shutdown Tuesday and the expiration of a moratorium on evictions at the end of the year because of the president’s refusal to sign the bill.
White House officials had the 5,000-page legislation flown to Mar-a-Lago, his club in Palm Beach, Fla., on Christmas Eve. He spent Christmas Day playing golf and, he said, making many calls.
About 24 hours after Congress
approved the measure, Trump emerged in a video from the White House to declare that it was a “disgrace.” He called for direct payments to be more than tripled to $2,000 per adult and assailed provisions in the funding bill — such as foreign aid and money for the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts — as
wasteful, though most of those provisions came almost dollar for dollar from his own budget request.
On Friday afternoon, Trump expressed further misgivings about the legislation that awaited his signature, but he still offered no hints on his plans.
“Why would politicians not want to give people $2000, rather than only $600?” he said on Twitter, possibly referring to his own party’s move Thursday to block a House Democratic bill that would have increased the size of direct payments to $2,000. “It wasn’t their fault, it was China. Give our people the money!”
Lawmakers in Congress and White House officials have indicated that they remain uncertain if Trump will relent and sign the legislation, issue a formal veto or just leave it unsigned. While Congress could potentially override Trump’s veto, sitting on the bill — a so-called pocket veto — would require the next Congress to reintroduce and vote on the legislation early next year.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said that she would hold a roll-call vote Monday on direct payments legislation that would satisfy Trump’s call for $2,000 direct payments and put pressure on Republicans, who oppose payments that high. Congress could also be forced to pass another stopgap spending measure to avoid a shutdown.