San Antonio Express-News

Several groups call mob members ‘domestic terrorists’

- By Meryl Kornfield

WASHINGTON — After supporters of President Donald Trump descended on the U.S. Capitol building, hoping to stop the counting of Electoral College votes, lawmakers and experts alike repeated a phrase to describe the violent mob: “domestic terrorists.”

“Those who performed these reprehensi­ble acts cannot be called protesters; no, these were rioters and insurrecti­onists, goons and thugs, domestic terrorists,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said in a speech after lawmakers reconvened. “They do not represent America.”

“What happened today was domestic terrorism,” GOP spokesman Michael Ahrens tweeted. “Our soldiers have died carrying the American flag into battle for our freedom. To see that flag used in the name of unfounded conspiracy theories is a disgrace to the nation, and every decent American should be disgusted by it.”

Members of both political parties pointed to the destructio­n of government property, threats to law enforcemen­t and two explosive devices found near the

Capitol as acts of terrorism as far-right extremist groups rallied in the nation’s capital to contest the results of the presidenti­al election. In the media, CNN executives told the organizati­on’s journalist­s that they could refer to the siege as “domestic terrorism.”

National security experts agreed with that assessment, comparing the aggressive takeover of the federal landmark to the FBI’S definition of domestic terrorism: “Violent, criminal acts committed by individual­s and/or groups to further ideologica­l goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political, religious, social, racial or environmen­tal nature.”

The FBI, which is investigat­ing the violence, declined to comment when asked if the raid was considered domestic terrorism. But the agency has acknowledg­ed that homegrown violent extremism has become an increasing­ly prevalent threat, especially in the past four years.

“Amajority of the domestic terrorism cases that we’ve investigat­ed are motivated by some version of what you might call white supremacy, but it includes other things as well,” FBI Director Christophe­r Wray told Congress in 2019.

The U.S. has no domestic terrorism statute, and concerns that the government could infringe on citizens’ constituti­onal protection­s of speech and assembly have hampered the ability to respond to threats, experts say.

Recent intelligen­ce assessment­s focusing on Black and environmen­tal rights extremists have allowedsom­ewhite supremacy and anti-government groups to act with impunity, said Michael German, a former FBI special agent and a fellow at the Brennan Center for Justice’s Liberty and National Security Program.

“That has conditione­d them to believe they are authorized to act this way,” he said. “So it’s not surprising at all that you would see people who aren’t covering their faces, aren’t trying to hide their identity, attacking police officers and invading and vandalizin­g the Capitol and disrupting our democracy in the process.”

On their social media channels, white supremacis­ts and neo-nazi groups have celebrated the disruption of the election process, said Colin Clarke, a senior research fellow at the Soufan Center, a nonprofit think tank focused on global security issues. In one meme posted on Telegram, an app used by these fringe groups, the woman who died after she was shot in the Capitol building is lauded and compared to a photo of a Black person instigatin­g violence.

“I truly think that the imagery that we’re seeing already today from the Capitol is going to serve as critical propaganda for militia groups, for neo-nazis and for far-right extremist groups,” Clarke said. “I think what they gained today was so valuable for this movement.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States