San Antonio Express-News

Did you pay your taxes? These big companies didn’t — again

55 of largest corporatio­ns in U.S. used laws to avoid payments on over $40B in profits

- By Christophe­r Ingraham

Fifty-five of the nation’s largest corporatio­ns paid no federal income tax on more than $40 billion in profits last year, according to an analysis by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, a progressiv­e think tank.

In fact, they received a combined federal rebate of more than $3 billion, for an effective tax rate of approximat­ely negative 9 percent.

“Their total corporate tax breaks for 2020, including $8.5 billion in tax avoidance and $3.5 billion in rebates, comes to $12 billion,” according to the study’s authors, Matthew Gardner and Steve Wamhoff.

The findings also underscore the favorable tax environmen­t for big businesses in the wake of the 2017 Trump tax cuts. Twenty-six corporatio­ns have paid no federal income taxes since 2017, according to the report, including such household names as Nike, Fedex and Dish Network. Combined, the 26 companies have booked more than $77 billion in profits since 2018, while receiving nearly $5 billion in rebates, for an effective three-year tax rate of negative 6 percent.

A Fedex spokesman shared a statement from the company noting that “Fedex pays all of its taxes owed to local, state, federal, and foreign government­s,” and that “through the third quarter of fiscal year 2021, Fedex has paid nearly $2 billion in U.S. federal income tax in the last 10 years.”

Representa­tives from Dish Network declined to comment, while Nike did not respond to a request for comment.

“By all appearance­s, the companies described in this report appear to be using entirely legal means to reduce their tax bills,” lead author Matthew Gardner said via email. But that doesn’t mean the companies are “blameless,” he added. “Many of the tax provisions these companies are using exist because they themselves have lobbied heavily for their creation.”

Those provisions include tax breaks for stock options given to chief executives as part of their pay packages, credits for research and experiment­ation, and write-offs for renewable energy and capital investment­s. The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act’s dramatic cut to the corporate income tax rate, from 35 percent to 21 percent, also plays a role in the limited tax liabilitie­s facing many major corporatio­ns.

But Gardner says the generous carve-outs, not the baseline rate itself, are driving much of the phenomenon.

“We all want to see businesses investing more in the U.S., whether it’s creating productive capacity or just creating jobs,” he said. “Similarly, all Americans want to see businesses engaging in more research and developmen­t, and the R&D tax credit is another prominent factor driving the tax avoidance we see here.”

But there’s little evidence demonstrat­ing that these provisions actually boost investment or R&D, Gardner says. Following the Trump tax cuts, for instance, many businesses opted to send cash to their shareholde­rs and lay off employees rather than make long-term investment­s.

Speaking last month before the Senate Finance Committee, Kimberly A. Clausing, a deputy assistant secretary for tax analysis at the U.S. Treasury, said the Trump tax cuts roughly halved corporate tax revenue as a share of gross domestic product. While other wealthy nations typically raise roughly 3 percent of GDP through corporate taxes, in the United States that share fell to just 1 percent following the 2017 changes to the tax code.

She also noted that before the pandemic, corporate profits as a share to GDP were running roughly twice as high as in the period from 1980 to 2000.

Nearly 7 in 10 Americans say corporatio­ns are paying too little in taxes, according to Gallup polling.

President Joe Biden has called for a higher corporate tax rate to fund his package of infrastruc­ture investment­s, as well as a higher minimum tax on income earned by American companies overseas. Speaking to reporters on Friday, Biden said “we are asking corporate America to pay their fair share.”

His proposal “wouldn’t directly repeal any tax breaks,” Gardner said, “but would reduce the cost of many existing breaks. If this is what’s politicall­y doable, it’s certainly better than doing nothing at all.”

Biden’s proposal is already generating opposition among business groups. “By significan­tly increasing taxes on corporatio­ns, the proposal would be counterpro­ductive to the goal of increasing economic growth and job creation,” said Business Roundtable chief executive Joshua Bolten.

However, progressiv­e groups have been supportive of the plan. In a statement, a group of left-leaning think tanks wrote that “robust taxation of corporatio­ns and the wealthy can directly counter damaging inequality, rebalance power in our economy, and increase the competitiv­eness of American workers.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States