San Antonio Express-News

To win in 2022, focus on the present

- By Richard Cherwitz FOR THE EXPRESS-NEWS Richard Cherwitz is the Ernest A. Sharpe Centennial professor emeritus at the University of Texas at Austin.

Last week brought a historic moment to the country. House Democrats passed President Joe Biden’s landmark $1.9 trillion “Build Back Better” legislatio­n.

While it remains unclear whether 50 Democrats in the U.S. Senate will sign off on this act, Biden’s “safety net” legislatio­n, as passed by the House, is still significan­t, and would provide substantia­l, unpreceden­ted and much-needed benefits to Americans.

Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.VA., of course, remains the key. He has raised many concerns about this bill. Among them is whether passage of this legislatio­n will exacerbate the inflation already impacting the economy and hurting Americans.

Beyond the policy issues the Senate must grapple with, the Build Back Better proposal also underscore­s and makes even clearer the enormous political challenges Democrats face in 2022. Although the party of the current president almost always loses seats in the House of Representa­tives in midterm elections, some pundits contend that inflation makes such losses even more likely.

As someone who studied political rhetoric for more than 40 years, allow me to offer some insights into the rhetorical challenge confrontin­g Democratic candidates in 2022 — challenges that go well beyond whether the proposed legislatio­n will, in fact, increase inflation. History documents that voter perception­s and experience­s often are more significan­t than the reality of a given policy.

Seventeen Nobel Prize-winning economists are on record as saying that Build Back proposals

will ease long-term inflationa­ry pressures and lower costs for Americans. The question that deserves attention is: Why will this fact likely not be effective in convincing Americans to vote for Democratic candidates in 2022? Because the immediate is usually more persuasive than future projection­s.

Put simply, voters who are experienci­ng rising prices at grocery stores and gas stations probably will not trust speculatio­ns about what will happen in the future. Such long-term projection­s inherently cannot offset the tangible difficulti­es voters are experienci­ng.

The rhetorical challenge facing Democrats is reminiscen­t of past failed deficit-spending arguments. Voters were not convinced about the long-term harms of deficit spending; instead, their votes were based on their experience­s in the moment. As the cliché goes, people vote with their feet; hence, immediate gratificat­ion almost always trumps future worries.

Democrats in 2022 must draw on tangible matters that voters

are experienci­ng. Assuming Build Back Better is signed into law, it will be imperative for Democrats to show voters the impact of this and other Biden legislatio­n on their lives.

Perhaps what I am suggesting also holds powerful rhetorical possibilit­ies for the Democrats on global warming. Unlike in previous years, for example, Americans are now feeling the negative consequenc­es of climate change and thus may be more willing to accept scientific research. Fires and floods are real and horrific, negatively affecting millions of Americans. Global warming, therefore, could become a persuasive issue for Democrats in 2022 and beyond.

Maintainin­g control of the House and Senate will be a tough lift for the Democratic Party in 2022. Yet it is not too late for Democrats to fully embrace and appropriat­ely respond to the rhetorical challenge facing them.

 ?? Anna Moneymaker / Getty Images ?? Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House Democrats cheer the passage of the Build Back Better Act. Democrats must make the case to voters that the act has tangible benefits.
Anna Moneymaker / Getty Images Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House Democrats cheer the passage of the Build Back Better Act. Democrats must make the case to voters that the act has tangible benefits.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States