San Antonio Express-News

INSTRUMENT­ED TEST REVIEWS

-

models have a smaller 8.0-inch touchscree­n with wireless Android Auto and Apple Carplay connectivi­ty, but strangely the SX’S larger screen requires you to plug your phone in with an old-fashioned USB cable in order to access those features.

With a wheelbase that’s 3.4 inches shorter than the Telluride’s, the Sorento is closer in size to two-row mid-size crossovers such as the Honda Passport, yet the Kia comes standard with a questionab­ly useful third row of seats. Accommodat­ions in the way back simply aren’t comfortabl­e for adults, with limited stretch-out space and a low bottom seat cushion that forces your knees up toward your chest. Plus, we only fit two carry-on suitcases in its cargo area with the third row raised versus the four we fit in the Telluride’s aft hold. If we owned a new Sorento, we’d probably leave the third row folded until we absolutely needed to ferry additional riders for short distances. Lower trim levels have a second-row bench seat and sevenpasse­nger capacity, but higher trims are limited to six riders with their second-row captain’s chairs.

The Sorento offers four powertrain options, including a base 191-hp 2.5-liter inlinefour, a turbocharg­ed 2.5-liter four, a hybrid that pairs with a 1.6-liter turbo four, and a plug-in hybrid with a larger battery pack that enables a claimed 32 miles of electric range. We’ve driven the optional 281-hp turbo 2.5-liter so far, and we enjoyed its responsive­ness and smooth power delivery. We also reviewed the hybrid separately.

Although the Sorento’s optional turbo four (EX and SX models only) is somewhat unusual in a segment where naturally aspirated V-6s remain the norm, that the engine mates to an eight-speed dual-clutch automatic transmissi­on is even more unconventi­onal. Kia claims that this setup enables quicker shifts and better fuel economy. Indeed, the 2.5-liter turbo’s 24-mpg EPA combined estimate for an all-wheel-drive model is identical to the figure for an equivalent Sorento with the significan­tly less powerful naturally aspirated engine and convention­al eight-speed torque-converter automatic.

We did notice a slight lag in throttle response when starting from a stop with the dualclutch, but the transmissi­on otherwise performed smoothly and unobtrusiv­ely. We measured a relatively swift zeroto-60-mph time of 6.3 seconds for the turbocharg­ed model, which is quicker than the Telluride and on pace with many V-6 competitor­s. We estimate that the naturally aspirated Sorento will be roughly 2.5 seconds off that pace.

Compared to the floaty ride and handling of the previousge­n Sorento, the new model feels considerab­ly more solid and planted on the road. While the new model’s 0.84 g of grip around our skidpad and 70-to-0-mph braking distance of 173 feet were both identical to a 2019 model we tested, the new car rides more confidentl­y. Even large bumps produce little noise from the suspension and minimal vibrations through the steering wheel. The tuning of the primary controls also is much improved, with nicely weighted steering and a firm brake pedal.

Starting at $30,565 for a front-wheel-drive LX model and ranging up to $43,765 for a top-spec all-wheel-drive SX Prestige X-line, the Sorento costs less than the larger Telluride, which starts at $33,415 and can top $50K with options. Given the Telluride’s presence and excellent packaging, it remains a highly tempting option among three-row utes. But the new Sorento is attractive in its own right. For sensible shoppers who don’t need its larger sibling’s extra size (and cost), Kia’s latest mid-size SUV has a lot to offer.

 ?? MICHAEL SIMARI / CAR AND DRIVER ??
MICHAEL SIMARI / CAR AND DRIVER

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States