San Antonio Express-News

Feds seek to protect rare plant in border wall path

- By Erin Douglas The Texas Tribune is a nonprofit, nonpartisa­n media organizati­on that informs Texans about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.

“When rare species like this start to disappear, it’s a warning that things are out of kilter.”

Chris Best, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service state botanist

The constructi­on of border barriers in the Rio Grande Valley could jeopardize a rare Texas plant’s survival, according to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service scientists.

The federal agency last week proposed an endangered species designatio­n for the prostrate milkweed, a native South Texas plant that has lost habitat to the invasive species buffelgras­s, which quickly colonizes patches of land cleared for developmen­t — including for the constructi­on of border barriers.

“Depending on the alignment, constructi­on (of border barriers) would obliterate prostrate milkweed plants” in one area of the plant’s habitat, a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s species status assessment report said.

All known U.S. population­s of prostrate milkweed are found within 8 miles of the Rio Grande, scientific studies show.

“We’ve always known it’s quite a rare species,” said Chris Best, the state botanist for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in Texas who worked on the agency’s proposal.

The Fish and Wildlife Service will make a final decision on the endangered species designatio­n in a year. If approved, the designatio­n would set aside 691 acres of habitat in Starr and Zapata counties deemed critical to the plant’s survival — including land in a national wildlife refuge in Starr County where U.S. Customs and Border Protection had scheduled road improvemen­ts and planned border barrier constructi­on. President Joe Biden paused most border barrier constructi­on when he took office.

In Starr and Zapata counties, 24 communitie­s of prostrate milkweed remain, according to an analysis by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Almost 80 percent of those communitie­s have very low numbers.

Eight more communitie­s are known to be scattered throughout Mexico. More plants might exist in Texas, but since much of the land is held by private landowners, and because the plant can survive dormant undergroun­d for months to years at a time, it’s excessivel­y difficult to survey.

Constructi­on that clears land — whether for border security activities, oil and gas wells, wind turbines or county roads — destabiliz­es and destroys the soil that the prostrate milkweed needs to thrive, while giving an advantage to its aggressive buffelgras­s competitor. Buffelgras­s was intentiona­lly introduced to South Texas from Africa by the federal and state government in the 1950s to help ranchers stabilize overgrazed and parched soil.

In one survey of a community of prostrate milkweed plants in Zapata County, 200 plants were identified between 1988 and 1993. By 2017 — after a fiber optic cable was installed in the highway right-of-way location — only one plant was found.

Endangered species designatio­ns generally slow land developmen­t by requiring the federal government to take additional protective measures for the plant or animal at risk before issuing the permits necessary for constructi­on.

But environmen­tal lawyers said it’s unclear whether a border wall would be blocked or even slowed by an endangered species designatio­n for the prostrate milkweed. The federal Department of Homeland Security has routinely waived environmen­tal laws to allow border wall constructi­on on federal land, and endangered plants on state and private lands have fewer protection­s under the Endangered Species Act.

“(The waivers) basically create a law-free zone,” said Brian Segee, a senior attorney with the Center for Biological Diversity, which sued the Fish and Wildlife Service to move faster to list the prostrate milkweed, along with dozens of other potentiall­y endangered species.

Sensitive habitat

The Trump administra­tion ultimately built only about 21 miles of new border barrier along the 1,200mile Texas-mexico border before Biden paused most of that work upon taking office. But Gov. Greg Abbott has since pursued a state-funded border barrier and began constructi­on in Starr County — one of the only known places in Texas where the prostrate milkweed still grows.

Nan Tolson, a spokespers­on for Abbott, wrote in a statement that Abbott believes the endangered species proposal shows the Biden administra­tion’s priorities are wrong.

“Instead of stepping up to protect innocent lives from human trafficker­s and stopping the influx of deadly drugs like fentanyl from coming across our border, President Biden has instead chosen to focus on protecting plants,” Tolson wrote.

Lawyers at the Center for Biological Diversity said the designatio­n would not prevent border barrier constructi­on by the federal government because the law only requires federal agencies to take additional steps for protection, such as setting aside other habitat for the species at risk.

And it wouldn’t do much to slow constructi­on of a state wall. The law does not require private landowners or state agencies to take precaution­s to protect endangered species’ habitat on their land unless the constructi­on requires a federal permit.

Private landowners can remove endangered plants on their land without consequenc­e. State law prohibits damaging endangered plants on state land; environmen­tal attorneys said it’s unclear whether the state of Texas could waive its own law.

Because most of Texas’ land is privately owned, the future of the prostrate milkweed will largely depend on the actions of landowners along the border. Best, the Fish and Wildlife botanist, said some landowners already have agreed to conservati­on easements, cooperated with scientists to conduct studies and partnered with nonprofit organizati­ons to protect the plant’s habitat.

“It’s part of the natural heritage of the region,” Best said. “When rare species like this start to disappear, it’s a warning that things are out of kilter; and if we don’t fix it, we’re going to lose more species.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States