San Antonio Express-News

Senators take step to repeal Iraq War approval

- By Mary Clare Jalonick and Ellen Knickmeyer

WASHINGTON — The Senate took a first step Thursday toward repealing two measures that give open-ended approval for military action in Iraq, pushing to end that authority as the United States marks the 20th anniversar­y of the Iraq War.

Senators voted 68-27 to move forward on legislatio­n that would repeal the 2002 measure that greenlight­ed that March 2003 invasion of Iraq and a 1991 measure that sanctioned the U.s.-led Gulf War to expel Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein's forces from Kuwait. Nineteen Republican­s joined Democrats in supporting the measure.

The bipartisan effort comes at a time when lawmakers of both parties are seeking to reclaim congressio­nal powers over U.S. military strikes and deployment­s, arguing that the war authorizat­ions are no longer necessary and subject to misuse if they are left on the books. President Joe Biden has backed the push, and the White House issued a statement Thursday in support.

“Repeal of these authorizat­ions would have no impact on current U.S. military operations and would support this administra­tion's commitment to a strong and comprehens­ive relationsh­ip with our Iraqi partners,” the White House said.

It's unclear whether leaders in the Republican-controlled House would bring the bill up for a vote. Forty-nine House Republican­s supported the legislatio­n when then-majority Democrats held a vote two years ago, but current House Speaker Kevin Mccarthy, R-calif., opposed it.

Senate Republican­s are also split on the legislatio­n. While the 19 GOP senators voted for it, opponents argue that the repeal could project weakness to U.S. enemies. They have pointed out that President Donald Trump's administra­tion cited the 2002 Iraq war resolution as part of its legal justificat­ion for a 2020 U.S. drone strike that killed Iranian Gen. Qassim Soleimani.

The October 2002 votes to give President George W. Bush broad authority for the invasion — coming just a month before the midterm elections that year — became a defining moment for many members of Congress as the country debated whether a military strike was warranted. The U.S. was already at war then in Afghanista­n, the country that hosted the al-qaida plotters responsibl­e for the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, something Iraq played no part in.

“The repeal of this authorizat­ion of use the use of military force does not mean the United States has become a pacifist nation,” Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin, a Democrat who was in the Senate at the time and voted against the resolution, said. “It means that the United States is going to be a constituti­onal nation and the premise of our Founding Fathers will be respected.”

The Bush administra­tion had drummed up support among members of Congress and Americans for invading Iraq by promoting false intelligen­ce claims about Saddam's weapons of mass destructio­n.

Nearly 5,000 U.S. troops were killed in the war. Iraqi deaths are estimated in the hundreds of thousands.

In the statement of policy, the White House said Biden would work with Congress to replace the authorizat­ions with “a narrow and specific framework more appropriat­e to protecting Americans from modern terrorist threats.”

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said in the hours before the vote that he was glad that the repeal is a bipartisan effort after the Iraq conflict was the cause of “so much bitterness” in the past.

“Americans are tired of endless wars in the Middle East,” Schumer said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States