San Antonio Express-News

Senate pushes to add natural gas plants

Package of bills walking back deregulate­d electricit­y market has bipartisan support

- By Cayla Harris and Kyra Buckley

State senators are aggressive­ly pursuing a plan to build more natural gas power plants and curb the growth of wind and solar energy in Texas, getting behind a suite of bills that energy experts say will walk back the state’s deregulate­d electricit­y market.

The nine-bill package has bipartisan support, and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick has threatened to force a special session if lawmakers don’t agree to bolster natural gas production this spring. Senators say the federal government offers unfair incentives to wind and solar plants, given how unreliable they can be during extreme weather events, making it tough for nonrenewab­le energy providers to compete.

Texas has to have generation “that can be counted on when the wind is not blowing and the sun is not shining,” state Sen. Charles Schwertner, a Georgetown Republican and the chair of the Senate Business and Commerce Committee, said during a news conference last week.

The legislatio­n would add to grid reforms the Legislatur­e passed after the deadly winter freeze in 2021, which Gov. Greg Abbott and other Republican­s have unduly blamed on wind and solar generation. Those failures were mostly attributab­le to a massive drop in natural gas production that prolonged statewide outages, federal investigat­ors determined.

Chief among the proposals is a plan to create a Texas “electricit­y insurance” program that would pay for 10,000 megawatts of new natural-gas-fired generation to be ready during an extreme weather event. Schwertner, who authored Senate Bill 6, compared it to a statewide backup generator.

Senate Bill 7 would require solar and wind providers to

have battery backups or agreements with natural gas plants to help them provide electricit­y if necessary. Another measure would require at least half of all new generation built in Texas to be coal- or natural-gas-powered — what’s known as “dispatchab­le” energy — starting in 2024.

The remaining six bills include less contentiou­s legislatio­n to prevent market power abuse and to protect the state’s electric grid from cyberattac­ks.

Higher costs

Doug Lewin, a renewable energy consultant, warned that the proposals will be “extremely expensive,” sending costs straight to consumers, and will “effectivel­y shut down” the renewable industry.

“Any time that you hear a policymake­r talking about raising costs on renewables, that’s raising costs on customers,” Lewin said. “Renewables benefit customers, and it’s nothing but a tax on electricit­y. That’s what it is — a massive tax on electricit­y that all Texans are going to pay.”

Proponents of the bills and some energy experts said the situation may not be that dire — and while the bills would certainly affect the renewables industry, they would only slow down its growth.

“We’re going to build those plants, and we’re going to have renewables that help keep our air clean and our prices low,” said Patrick, who oversees the Senate. “That’s why a lot of companies move here. And we’re going to have dispatchab­le that guarantees, in the worst weather conditions, that when you hit that light switch, the lights come on.

“Businesses won’t come to Texas, and citizens won’t feel safe, unless they know we have the dispatchab­le power for the growing needs of Texas,” he said.

It’s a concern at the federal level, too, as the Biden administra­tion promotes renewable energy in an ongoing effort to curb climate change.

“What keeps me up at night is making sure that we have ample dispatchab­le baseload power,” U.S. Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm said in a meeting with Hearst Newspapers.

She said there are ways to make renewables more reliable that don’t involve more natural gas, like using battery storage. Officials also can turn to clean energy sources that are more consistent, like geothermal, hydroelect­ric and nuclear.

Patrick has said he will force a special session in Austin “if we do not get the grid fixed” by the time the regular legislativ­e session ends in May. Both Republican­s and Democrats are supporting the Senate bills, and senators say they also are working with House members to garner support in the lower chamber.

A spokespers­on for Rep. Craig Goldman, the Fort Worth Republican who heads the House Energy Resources Committee, did not respond to a request for comment.

‘No incentive to build’

Under the current Texas electricit­y market, power generation is supposed to be unregulate­d with a competitiv­e market structure that only pays for the electricit­y produced.

Patrick, during last week’s news conference, said the new legislatio­n was not a move away from that design.

But University of Houston Energy Fellow Ed Hirs said the plan, which he supports, is a “complete repudiatio­n” of the electricit­y market design the Legislatur­e passed in the late ’90s and the state implemente­d in 2002.

That plan broke the electricit­y market up into the three segments seen today: deregulate­d power plants that are only paid for the energy they produce; regulated transmissi­on and distributi­on companies, like Centerpoin­t, that earn a guaranteed rate of return for building transmissi­on lines and other infrastruc­ture; and deregulate­d retail electricit­y providers that buy power on the market and sell it to consumers.

Hirs said that market design was shortsight­ed from the start, moving the state to a system that fails to encourage maintenanc­e and continued growth to account for increasing population and other variables.

“It does not matter what the source of power is — renewable, nuclear, natural gas,” Hirs said. “There’s been no incentive to build new power plants. That’s the issue.”

Hirs said Texas would be facing these problems even if renewables hadn’t come onto the system with so much gusto. But because wind and solar energy has become so cheap to produce and doesn’t have a fuel cost like natural gas, it has been hard for legacy plants to compete in the Texas system, he said.

That means a system must be in place, Hirs said, to incentiviz­e natural gas and coal plants to be ready to go when electricit­y demand is high and renewable generation is low — like during an extreme weather event — even though, overall, natural gas and coal will likely give way to more and more renewable generation.

The proposed legislatio­n would do just that, Hirs noted, but he doesn’t credit Patrick for coming up with the fix.

“He’s been backed into a box that he helped create,” Hirs said, adding that state lawmakers should have seen the need for emergency generation before it became dire during weather events like freezes in 2011 and 2021.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States