San Diego Union-Tribune (Sunday)

RUTH BADER GINSBURG: MOURNING A GIANT

-

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death Friday of complicati­ons of pancreatic cancer at age 87 pitched off a huge emotional reaction across America with no parallel in court history.

News of her death was sudden, the outpouring intense. Ginsburg first gained a reputation as a legal giant in the 1970s when she won sweeping constituti­onal protection­s against sex discrimina­tion in five cases she argued before the Supreme Court while leading the Women's Rights Project of the American Civil Liberties Union. Her efforts were personally informed by the patronizin­g treatment she received from male professors while studying law at Harvard and then Columbia and from male administra­tors while teaching law at Rutgers. Her core argument — that it was unconstitu­tional to treat women and men differentl­y based on stereotype­s of female servility and fragility — is now an accepted standard. “A gender line ... helps to keep women not on a pedestal, but in a cage,” she observed.

Ginsburg's career had many parallels with that of the first African American justice, Thurgood Marshall, who was applauded for his many victories in civil rights cases before joining the Supreme Court in 1967. “Ruth Ginsburg was as responsibl­e as any one person for legal advances that women made under the Equal Protection Clause of the Constituti­on,” said Marcia Greenberge­r, co-president of the National Women's Law Center, on her nomination.

After she was chosen by President Bill Clinton in 1993 to be the second woman on the high court — and the first to be progressiv­e — Ginsburg's stature kept growing until she emerged as a cultural icon, known as the Notorious RBG, revered by women of all ages. She was the subject of a 2018 documentar­y and a 2018 feature film and held public events at sports arenas because so many wanted to hear her talk. She was admired both for her determinat­ion to protect the interests of women and the downtrodde­n and for the grit and courage she showed in dealing with repeated bouts of cancer and other physical woes since 1999 and her husband's death in 2010.

But late in her career, after appointmen­ts by President George W. Bush strengthen­ed the Supreme Court's conservati­ve majority, Ginsburg's fiery dissents against decisions limiting access to contracept­ives and narrowing the scope of the Affordable Care Act in ways that hurt women offered a reminder of why she came to prominence in the first place: the brilliance of her legal mind and her lifelong resistance to the idea that the law could treat men and women differentl­y.

President Donald Trump and Senate Republican Leader Mitch Mcconnell have already signaled they will ignore the 2016 precedent in which the Senate GOP majority wouldn't even consider Judge Merrick Garland, nominated by President Barack Obama, because the decision should be left to the next president. The hypocrisy this displays is sure to lead to ugly political fights in coming days.

This is unavoidabl­e, but it's also extremely sad — because it will distract attention from the late justice's glorious accomplish­ments and how she changed U.S. law for the fairer and better even before reaching the Supreme Court. America is a lesser place without Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States