San Diego Union-Tribune (Sunday)
IS BUYING TWO HOTELS IN SAN DIEGO COUNTY FOR HOMELESS PEOPLE A GOOD USE OF FUNDS?
ECONOMISTS YES
The county has a serious problem with homelessness, which is compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic. If the money is available through federal and state programs, San Diego should take advantage of that. It would allow the convention center to be freed up and it would put to use two hotels that might otherwise be shut down. Dispersing the homeless to Kearny Mesa and Mission Valley is a good idea because there are problems when there are high concentrations of poverty.
NO
The problem is not just a lack of shelter, but also stems from addiction, mental illness, and lack of opportunity and responsibility. I think we need to tackle these problems with an integrated strategy. Having said that, the homeless are a huge social problem and COVID has made it imperative to find solutions. If we take this step, let’s put all our energy behind trying to make it work.
YES
A plan to solve homelessness in the region is desperately needed and must be well thought out. Purchasing hotels seems to be an expedient and cost-effective way to acquire immediate units given the funding coming from the state and federal governments. Purchasing too many hotels could be risky, however, as the long-term costs associated with managing and maintaining these properties is truly not yet understood.
NO
This works out to just under $360,000 per room, so it does not appear that these are distressed sale prices. If these were distressed sales, at lower prices, it would make more sense. Soon, there will be several hotels selling at distressed prices, so better deals will become available. At the same time, if this is grant money only available now, then I understand why the housing commission would view it as a one-time opportunity if waiting for better-priced deals is not possible.
EXECUTIVES YES
The San Diego Housing Commission’s hotel purchase is a sound approach to stem the county’s mounting homeless problem. The housing should be transitional, and residents should be provided case management and connections to supportive services. Also, a highly adequate security plan is paramount for the wellbeing of the residents and the community area. Though the commission’s effort is a good step, it does not overshadow the need for a permanent housing solution.
YES
The purchase of two extended stay facilities that are in good condition, fully furnished, have common spaces available for services, and are ready for immediate occupancy should help. The process is getting done, from concept to actual occupancy, in less than a year, rather than a typical two to four years of development. Because of this the purchase of the hotels should be a more efficient use of taxpayer money to help address a significant ongoing regional issue.
NO
San Diego must first have a plan that can work before we start buying property without a current appraisal. I much prefer spending less money for more services. A camp like the proposed Sunbreak Ranch would include dedicated teams of mental health professionals, drug rehabilitation specialists and vocational trainers on a site outside of town. Buying hotels at peak of the market prices is not an idea that would receive my vote.
YES
As both a social and health care issue, homelessness is even more concerning during the COVID-19 pandemic. We have avoided a dangerous coronavirus outbreak among the homeless population by providing safe housing in the convention center. But that’s not a long-term solution. The hotels could provide a safe alternative, but social services, mental and physical health, and security issues must be addressed there as well. The city also must be sensitive to other hotels and businesses nearby.