San Diego Union-Tribune (Sunday)

LINKEDIN THRIVING PLATFORM FOR BLACK COMMENT

Trend unexpected considerin­g site’s staid reputation

- BY ASHANTI M. MARTIN

One day in September, Elizabeth Leiba opened the Linkedin app and saw a post by Aaisha Joseph, a diversity consultant with nearly 16,000 followers on the platform.

“Ima need #companies to stop sending their dedicated House Negros to ‘deal with the Blacks’ they deem out of control,” read the item. “It’s really not a good look — it’s actually a very #whitesupre­macist and #racist one.”

The post was exactly the sort of thing Leiba, an instructio­nal design manager at City College in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., was looking for. These days, when she pulls out her phone in search of boisterous conversati­on, hot takes and the latest tea, she finds herself tapping Linkedin, which since the killing of George Floyd has become a thriving forum for Black expression.

“I go onto Twitter and I get bored,” Leiba, 46, said. “Then I go right back to Linkedin because it’s on fire. I don’t even have to go on any other social media now.”

It’s an unexpected developmen­t for what has long been the most polite and perhaps the dullest of the major social networks. Linkedin was founded in 2003 as a place to network and post résumés — essentiall­y, a directory of whitecolla­r profession­als. A few years ago, Linkedin added a Facebook-like news feed

that encouraged users to post links and updates, but it has never been a rollicking space. A team of editors helped enforce a mood best described as corporate.

“You talk on Linkedin the same way you talk in the office,” Dan Roth, Linkedin’s editor-in-chief, told The New York Times in August 2019. “There are certain boundaries around what is acceptable.”

Two staggering events have changed that. In early 2020, the pandemic hit, forcing millions to work from home and miss out on breakroom chitchat — boosting Linkedin as a place to vent. Then, the killing of Floyd in police custody in May put workers over the edge. Black grief went on display, uninhibite­d, at corporate America’s virtual water cooler.

“I was just 43 years tired,” said Future Cain, a socialand emotional-learning director at a middle and high school in Wisconsin. “I was using Linkedin to post positive things and uplift people during the pandemic, and I decided I can’t sit here quietly anymore.”

As protesters took to the streets to demand police reform, Leiba and Cain were among those who discovered that Linkedin was a place to speak to the executive class on something like their home turf. Black users have taken to the site to call out racial discrimina­tion in the workplace and share their stories of alienation on the job.

Black Linkedin has been emerging as a profession­al cousin to Black Twitter — the unapologet­ically Black digital space where people expose long-ignored injustices and pump their experience into the mainstream.

What’s less clear is how comfortabl­e Linkedin is with the developmen­t, having placed its content moderators in the incendiary position of determinin­g what manner of race-related speech is appropriat­e for its virtual workplace of 706 million users.

Black users who post in forceful tones, and some of their allies, say they feel Linkedin has silenced them — erasing their posts and even freezing their accounts for violating vague rules of decorum.

For example, the “House Negros” post that Joseph wrote in September vanished from the platform. Linkedin added an unsigned note in red, saying the post had been removed for violating the site’s Profession­al Community Policies, which instruct users to “be civil and respectful in every single interactio­n.” Joseph began a new item: “Let me say it louder since Linkedin wanted to delete my post the first time.” The company removed that post, too, saying it included “harassment, defamation or disparagem­ent of others.”

Theresa M. Robinson, a corporate training consultant in Houston, said Linkedin had deleted a post she wrote about racism, then reinstated it after she complained. She said she never received an explanatio­n. Two others, Cain and Madison Butler, who works in Austin, Texas, also said Linkedin had restricted their commentary on race.

In the absence of clear communicat­ion from the company, these users are left guessing as to what the rules are — and feeling that the company is not just policing their tone but stifling their opportunit­y to force change in corporate America.

Nicole Leverich, a Linkedin spokeswoma­n, wrote in an email: “We are not censoring content and have not made any changes to our algorithm to reduce the distributi­on of content about these important topics.” She added in an interview that Linkedin was introducin­g a new process for notifying users when their posts were flagged for violating platform rules, and that some people hadn’t been phased in by the end of September.

The company acknowledg­ed that it had erred in taking action against some users and restored content that was found, on appeal, not to violate its policies.

“If we make a mistake, we will own it,” said Paul Rockwell, head of Linkedin’s trust and safety division. “We will be very clear — this is a learning opportunit­y for us. We’re going to continue to use that in our journey to get better and better. And we do want to nail this thing.”

Hard discussion­s about race

Few people think Linkedin should look anything like the wilds of Reddit or Twitter, which have a certain amount of anonymity and even anarchy built into their DNA. Much of Linkedin’s value — Microsoft acquired it in 2016 for $26 billion — is tied to its sense of profession­alism and respectful conduct. Users must share their real names and credential­s, and it’s understood that their current or prospectiv­e employers might well scan anything they post.

For Black people in the corporate realm, however, words like “profession­al” and “respectful” are red flags. Like the natural Black hairstyles that were once widely considered unprofessi­onal, certain behaviors — being too Black, speaking too Black or talking too much about Black topics — have long limited advancemen­t in companies with white cultures.

That’s what has changed on Linkedin in the last few months. Black people are being, to use a technical term, Blackity-black Black on Linkedin. Much of the behavior is not so different from Black Twitter; users pepper their posts with clap emojis to emphasize every syllable, and GIFS celebrate cultural touchstone­s like Issa Rae’s “Insecure” and Jordan Peele’s “Get Out.” The difference is that it is all happening on a social network that mirrors the business world — a place that is predominan­tly white.

Inevitably, not everyone accepts this kind of exuberance. Posts about Black Lives Matter and racial justice often attract the same kind of dismissive, and sometimes bigoted, responses found on other platforms: rejoinders that “all lives matter” or claims about Black-on-black crime. But because the activity takes place on Linkedin, these comments typically come with the user’s headshot, place of employment and entire work history attached.

“You start to see these people who are absolutely not OK with this focus on Blackness popping up in commentary, with their name and their company fully on display, giving zero deference to the moment,” said John Graham Jr., 39, a digital marketer and strategist at a California biotechnol­ogy company.

Linkedin has also struggled internally with how to respond to the Black Lives Matter movement. In June, chief executive Ryan Roslansky publicly apologized for “appalling” racial comments some employees had made at a companywid­e staff meeting.

Rosanna Durruthy, Linkedin’s head of diversity, inclusion and belonging, said that the company was engaging in hard conversati­ons about race, both inside the company and out.

“We’re really beginning to focus very consistent­ly on how we begin to address this externally” on the platform, she said.

‘Break down the status quo’

One of the most vociferous presences on Black Linkedin is Butler, a human resources consultant and vice president at a startup. She has posted on Linkedin since 2018 and with increasing frequency and fervor this year. The potential to speak truth to capital, she said, makes the resulting rounds of death threats worth it.

“There is something to be said about the access Linkedin gives you to powerful CEOS and VCS to help change their outlook and how they support Black employees and founders,” said Butler, 29, referring to venture capitalist­s. “The conversati­on that has to happen in order to break down the status quo in corporate America isn’t happening on Instagram.”

Butler, who has about 40,000 followers, posts on Linkedin daily. Her style is to be prescripti­ve, assail corporate norms and call out whitesplai­ners and trolls; she tends to close each missive with the hashtags #isaidwhati­said, #thatsthete­a and #blackgirlm­agic.

One recent post scolded companies that make a show of cheering on the Black Lives Matter movement but haven’t done right by their employees.

“Do the Black people in your organizati­on feel like they matter, or do they feel like the Black stock photos you used to enhance your ‘wokeness’ footprint in the marketplac­e. If you can’t make the Black lives under your own roof matter, do not use Black Lives Matter as a brand strategy,” Butler wrote recently. “Don’t talk about it, be about it. Period.”

Other stars of Black Linkedin target specific companies. Joseph, for example, has recently called out Wells Fargo, Doordash, Microsoft and Google.

There has also been no shortage of criticism of Linkedin itself. Users are holding the company to a standard it set for itself in June, when Melissa Selcher, chief marketing and communicat­ions officer, wrote an open letter on the platform.

“We have a responsibi­lity to use our platform and resources to intentiona­lly address the systemic barriers to economic opportunit­y,” she wrote. “We also believe we play a critical role in amplifying Black voices.”

Also in June, with Black Lives Matter protests spreading across the country, Linkedin highlighte­d “Black Voices to Follow and Amplify,” a curated list of chief executives, media personalit­ies and other influencer­s, including the Rev. Bernice King and Karamo Brown from the Netf lix show “Queer Eye.”

Joseph and others took to Linkedin to say the group contained too many establishm­ent names and not enough activists. “Where are the Tamika Mallorys of Linkedin on that list?” Joseph wrote, referring to a cofounder of the 2017 Women’s March.

 ?? THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? Linkedin removed two posts written by Aaisha Joseph, a diversity consultant, for violating a policy that requires users to “be civil and respectful.”
THE NEW YORK TIMES Linkedin removed two posts written by Aaisha Joseph, a diversity consultant, for violating a policy that requires users to “be civil and respectful.”
 ?? BENJAMIN NORMAN RICHARD A. CHANCE THE NEW YORK TIMES ??
BENJAMIN NORMAN RICHARD A. CHANCE THE NEW YORK TIMES

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States