RESIDENTS FIGHT PLAN FOR FENCES

Transit district hopes to limit access to hazardous areas

North County Transit District plans to install fences along miles of railroad track in three coastal cities by the end of this year, an idea many residents, especially in Del Mar, have fought for years.

The transit district, in a report released this month, said the 6-foot-tall, chainlink fence will be placed in the areas where people most frequently trespass on the track right-of-way, resulting in death or injury, damage to the railroad system and delays in service.

Transit officials say they don’t need the cities’ approvals to build the fence, but meanwhile they have applied to a little-known federal agency — the Surface Transportation Board — to waive the need for oversight from Del Mar and the California Coastal Commission for the fence and other projects related to safety on the blufftop tracks.

Many people believe it’s their right to cross the railroad tracks whether they want to get to the beach or simply enjoy the view. People feel strongest about this in Del Mar, where some of the most expensive homes in San Diego County are beside the railroad tracks that hug the edge of the coast.

“I, as many surfers and beach-goers, access the beach via 11th Street in Del Mar,” said resident Camilla Rang, one of about 130 people who wrote letters to the transit district opposing the fence. “I do not want my access to be impeded by fencing on the bluff in Del Mar. As a resident of California, I have a constitutional right to access the beach.”

Rang and others said Del Mar residents were granted the right to cross the tracks by the Santa Fe Railroad deed in 1909, though the city only incorporated 60 years ago.

“We will never accept it,” Rang said in her letter. “We will fight to our last breath. We will scream and we will fight and we will win. The bluff and the beach is our backyard, has always been and will always be. It’s the train that should move, not us, and you know it.”

NCTD and the San Diego Association of Governments, the regional planning agency, plan to eventually move the tracks away from the beach in Del Mar to a new inland route through tunnels. However, the relocation would cost more than $3 billion and there’s no money for construction. Obtaining construction funding, along with all the other preliminary work, is expected to take at least 10 years, and construction would take another decade.

Meanwhile, coastal erosion and rising sea levels pose an increasing threat to the bluff-top tracks. Every year, there’s less room for people to walk along the tracks and new slides threaten the railroad bed. NCTD and SANDAG are in the fourth phase of a sixphase, multimillion-dollar effort to stabilize the Del Mar tracks where they are.

Fencing also is planned for the tracks in Oceanside and Encinitas, where the idea has been less of an issue because the tracks there are not so close to the beach. But even though the tracks are a few blocks inland, people frequently cross illegally to get to popular places such the restaurants and bars along North Coast Highway in Leucadia.

Normally, any coastal construction such as bluff repairs and the fence require approval from the California Coastal Commission and the local jurisdictions involved.

However, in an attempt to bypass those approvals, NCTD filed a “petition for declaratory order” in August with the federal Surface Transportation Board asking the agency to waive the state and local permits.

Del Mar’s City Council some time ago voted to oppose fencing “that would mitigate tragic trespassing events and reduce ongoing delays to passenger and freight rail service,” the petition says. Also, the transit district “has numerous crucial, upcoming rail maintenance and upgrading projects that will be challenged under the Coastal Act or local coastal laws.”

Del Mar and the San Diego chapter of the Surfrider Foundation have both asked the federal agency to deny the transit district’s petition.

“In essence, NCTD asked for a waiver to indefinitely bypass state review processes that exist to ensure the proper management of coastal zone resources and ensure public access to our beaches,” states a response Surfrider posted on its website Oct. 8.

Del Mar, in its official reply to the NCTD petition, said the requested declaratory order is “inappropriate, unwise, and unnecessary.”

“Despite its best efforts throughout its 168-page petition to try and manufacture one, NCTD fails to present an actual, present controversy or uncertainty that could be resolved by the issuance of a declaratory order,” states the city’s response.

No date has been provided for a final decision on the petition, said NCTD Marketing and Communications Manager Kimy Wall.