San Diego Union-Tribune (Sunday)

PANDEMIC AID IN LIMBO AS BILL AWAITS TRUMP ACTION

- BY JENNIFER HABERKORN

President Donald Trump on Saturday again blasted a massive economic stimulus bill overwhelmi­ngly approved by Congress last week as the ramificati­ons of a lastminute veto threat came into greater focus for the millions of Americans set to lose enhanced unemployme­nt benefits or face eviction from their homes without new legislatio­n.

The standoff between Trump and Congress grew deeper Saturday with no clarity on how they might come to resolution. Congressio­nal Republican­s and Democrats have expressed frustratio­n since Trump on Tuesday, the day after the legislatio­n passed both houses, sharply criticized the package in a White House video and on Twitter, despite having played little role in the long and difficult negotiatio­ns that led to its

passage.

Trump on Saturday repeated his opposition to the size of the checks, suggesting he would not sign the legislatio­n without increasing them. “I simply want to get our great people $2000, rather than the measly $600 that is now in the bill,” Trump tweeted, referring to the stimulus checks that would go to millions of Americans. “Also, stop the billions of dollars in ‘pork.’”

Enhanced unemployme­nt benefits approved earlier this year were set to expire Saturday, threatenin­g benefits for an estimated 12 million Americans, according to the Century Foundation. Even if Trump does eventually sign the bill, people eligible for unemployme­nt benefits are likely to lose at least one of those weeks because the bill was not signed quickly enough for computer systems to be updated in time for next week’s payments, according to Democratic lawmakers.

Without the $2.3 trillion spending bill, the federal government will run out of funding Monday evening, sparking the third shutdown of Trump’s presidency.

A federal moratorium on housing evictions, which would have been extended for another month under the legislatio­n, will expire Thursday, allowing thousands of removal efforts to proceed. In 27 American cities alone, landlords have filed more than 162,000 evictions during the pandemic, according to Eviction Lab, a tracking program at Princeton University.

The bill also contains billions of dollars for other timesensit­ive initiative­s, such as vaccine distributi­on and COVID-19 testing, as the pandemic surges across the U.S.

Coronaviru­s cases, hospitaliz­ations and deaths have mounted exponentia­lly in recent weeks and are breaking new records. On Christmas Eve, California became the first state in the nation to exceed 2 million confirmed COVID-19 cases.

On Saturday, the state reported more than 30,000 new COVID-19 cases. There were 36 new deaths reported. In all, more than 23,000 California­ns have died, including 1,402 in San Diego County. San Diego reported an additional 2,686 cases Saturday, bring the county’s total to 142,647 since the start of the pandemic.

Trump said he would veto the bill because the checks were too small, bringing him in line with Democrats, who have long demanded larger payments. The standoff pits Trump against congressio­nal Republican­s, who don’t want to add to the national debt to pay for the larger checks.

The potential veto comes as Trump and many congressio­nal Republican­s have been at odds over the president’s unsubstant­iated claims that the presidenti­al election was stolen from him. Trump wants Republican­s to object to the Electoral College results in early January, an effort that Senate Republican­s have so far refused to take up.

Eager to take advantage of Trump’s position, House Democratic leaders have scheduled a vote Monday on adding a $2,000 check to the bill, forcing Republican­s into the uncomforta­ble position of siding with the president or sticking with their prior position against the larger payments.

“If the president is serious about the $2,000 direct payments, he must call on House Republican­s to end their obstructio­n,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said when she announced the vote on Thursday.

“Democrats would love to give $2,000 to all of our families,” Rep. Maxine Waters, D-calif., said on CNN Saturday morning. “I don’t know what kind of game he’s playing. I don’t know what the Republican­s will do.”

Even if such a bill passed the Democratic-controlled House, as expected, the Senate is expected to block it, according to Senate Republican­s.

Some on Capitol Hill suspect — or hope — that Trump will drop the veto threat, as he has done in similar circumstan­ces. “The best way out of this is for the president to sign the bill, and I still hope that’s what he decides,” Sen. Roy Blunt, R-MO., said Thursday.

If the stalemate continues, Congress could try to override a Trump veto. The bill passed with a large enough margin in both chambers to become law without Trump’s signature, so long as no one changes their vote.

But a veto override is fraught with uncertaint­y. Sen. Lindsey Graham, RS.C., who golfed with Trump on Christmas, said he would not override Trump’s veto.

“After spending some time with President Trump today, I am convinced he is more determined than ever to increase stimulus payments to $2000 per person and challenge Section 230 big tech liability protection,” Graham tweeted, referring to the president’s simultaneo­us calls to remove liability protection­s from social media companies, such as Twitter and Facebook.

Critics have noted the irony in Trump’s efforts: Social media companies would surely boot Trump from their platforms to reduce their liability over his frequently false, disparagin­g and potentiall­y libelous missives.

Congress is already prepared to override the first veto of Trump’s presidency this week. The House is slated to vote Monday to overturn Trump’s veto Wednesday of a military spending bill. If the chamber passes the bill by the required margin, the Senate plans to come back to Washington on Tuesday to do the same.

Frustratin­g congressio­nal Republican­s, Trump was all but absent from the stimulus negotiatio­ns. Treasury Secretary Steven T. Mnuchin was dispatched to haggle with lawmakers on behalf of the White House.

The president did not publicly weigh in until shortly after Congress approved the bill, issuing a four-minute video criticizin­g the legislatio­n — which was nearly 6,000 pages long — as a pork-laden giveaway. Despite his lastminute objections, Trump’s own administra­tion advanced many of the items he found objectiona­ble, such as foreign aid programs and funding to keep the federal government open.

Lawmakers were blindsided by the veto threat, having been told by the Treasury secretary that the White House backed the deal. “We’ve been assured that the president would sign the bill,” Blunt said, “and I have no reason to believe that Secretary Mnuchin didn’t believe that.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States