San Diego Union-Tribune (Sunday)

“Tiger” documentar­y missing vital element: Tiger input.

- Bonesteel writes for The Washington Post.

There’s a clip late in HBO’S two-part Tiger Woods documentar­y in which an on-course golf announcer says: “We often wonder what’s going through his mind.

“What we wouldn’t give to know his thoughts.”

“Tiger,” the first 90 minutes of which premieres today at 9 p.m. on the paycable network, seems to wonder right along with that nameless announcer from 2013. Woods declined invitation­s to participat­e, according to Richard Deitsch of The Athletic. So while Woods is front and center, his voice is heard almost entirely in clips gleamed from press appearance­s, at which — as you already know if you’ve been following for the past 25 or so years — Woods is famously guarded.

So we’re left with an unrevealin­g portrait of a towering sports figure, the dots connected by people who either have known Tiger Woods, worked with or for Tiger Woods or covered Tiger Woods as members of the media. And that’s fine; it wouldn’t be a documentar­y without all that. But imagine how enlighteni­ng it would have been to see something along the lines of Woods reacting to old clips or interviews shown to him on a tablet, as Michael Jordan

did in ESPN’S mostly acclaimed Chicago Bulls documentar­y from last year. Or, really, to see Woods — at this stage of his life, with the wisdom that comes with decades of busy adulthood — react earnestly to anything at all.

The treasures are few in the film, which is directed by Oscar-nominated documentar­ians Matthew Heineman and Matthew Hamachek and is based upon a 2018 biography of Woods by Jeff Benedict and Armen Keteyian. Woods’ high school girlfriend, Dina Parr, humanizes the golfer with 1990s-era home video of Woods acting like a goof ball teenager and stories of their time together. But she also reveals that he “had no life skills” and ended their three-year relationsh­ip in a handwritte­n letter in which Woods said he felt “used and manipulate­d by you and your family.”

(That letter also is old news, having been obtained and published by E Online in December 2009.)

“Tiger” hints but never comes right out and says that Woods’ father and mother ordered him to end his relationsh­ip with Parr. And Earl Woods looms especially large in the documentar­y, whose two parts are cleaved into the time in which Tiger’s father was alive and the time after he died in 2006. (Woods’s mother, Kultida, gets a brief mention as a strict disciplina­rian but otherwise is not much talked about, though the revelation that she often referred to rival Phil Mickelson as “Hefty” instead of the accepted nickname “Lefty” drew a chuckle.)

Earl Woods was a Vietnam veteran who put a club in Tiger’s hands when the latter was barely a toddler. He would teach his son to deal with on-course distractio­ns by jingling his keys in his pocket or talking loudly with others while Tiger was putting. He also was prone to saying outlandish stuff such as this (in 1996, while Tiger still was in college):

“My heart fills with so much joy when I realize that this young man is going to help so many people. He will transcend this game and bring to the world a humanitari­anism which has never been known before. The world will be a better place to live in by virtue of his existence and his presence. This is my treasure. Please accept it and use it wisely.”

As for how Tiger felt about his dad anointing him as the Chosen One, all we get is a clip of a much younger Woods saying, “That’s just a dad speaking.”

The second part of “Tiger,” which airs Jan. 17, deals mainly with Woods’ downfall after his father’s death: his marriage to Elin Nordegren, his very public implosion of that marriage and the injuries that beset him in the previous decade. Again, this is well-trod ground. Much time is spent on Woods’ training with the Navy SEALS after his father’s death, the subject of a Wright Thompson ESPN story from 2016. (Thompson is a talking head in the documentar­y.) Even more time is spent on the tabloid fallout after Woods’ infideliti­es came to light. That leaves little time for Woods’ oncourse redemption at the 2019 Masters, where he won his 15th major title: It’s shoehorned into the last 10 minutes of a documentar­y that spans three hours and offers little in the way of revelation.

 ?? PHELAN M. EBENHACK AP ?? Tiger Woods declined to participat­e in HBO’S “Tiger” documentar­y, leaving a less-than-revealing portrait.
PHELAN M. EBENHACK AP Tiger Woods declined to participat­e in HBO’S “Tiger” documentar­y, leaving a less-than-revealing portrait.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States