San Diego Union-Tribune (Sunday)

FAMED NYC MUSEUM CLOSES TWO EXHIBIT HALLS

Seeks to repatriate Native American remains, artifacts

- BY PHILIP MARCELO Marcelo writes for The Associated Press.

New York’s American Museum of Natural History closed two halls featuring Native American objects Saturday, acknowledg­ing the exhibits are “severely outdated” and contain culturally sensitive items.

The mammoth complex across from Central Park on Manhattan’s Upper West Side is the latest U.S. institutio­n to cover up or remove Native American exhibits to comply with recently revamped federal regulation­s dealing with the display of Indigenous human remains and cultural items.

The museum said in October that it would pull all human remains from display, with the aim of eventually repatriati­ng as much as it could to Native American tribes and other rightful owners.

Sean Decatur, the museum’s president, said in a letter to staff Friday that the latest move reflects the “growing urgency” among museums to change their relationsh­ips with tribes and how they exhibit Indigenous cultures.

“The halls we are closing are vestiges of an era when museums such as ours did not respect the values, perspectiv­es, and indeed shared humanity of Indigenous peoples,” he wrote. “Actions that may feel sudden to some may seem long overdue to others.”

Earlier this month, Chicago’s Field Museum covered several displays containing Native American items. Harvard University’s Peabody Museum of Archaeolog­y and Ethnology has said it would remove all Native American funerary items from its exhibits. The Cleveland Museum of Art is another institutio­n that has taken similar steps.

Shannon O’loughlin, head of the Associatio­n on American Indian Affairs, a national group that has long called for museums to comply with the federal requiremen­ts, welcomed such developmen­ts but said the true test is what ultimately becomes of the removed items.

“Covering displays or taking things down isn’t the goal,” she said. “It’s about repatriati­on — returning objects back to tribes. So this is just one part of a much bigger process.”

Todd Mesek, a Cleveland Museum of Art spokespers­on, said the institutio­n is consulting with Native American groups to secure their consent to display certain items as well as reviewing archival records to determine if there is already some agreement on record.

Jason Newton, a Harvard spokespers­on, said the Peabody is committed to returning all ancestral remains and funerary items and has more than doubled the number of staffers working toward that end in recent months. The museum also announced this month that it would cover the expenses of tribal members traveling to campus as part of the repatriati­on process.

The revised regulation­s released in December by the U.S. Department of the Interior are related to the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriati­on Act of 1990. The changes include expanded requiremen­ts for consulting with and receiving tribes’ consent to exhibit and conduct research on Indigenous artifacts, including human remains and funerary, sacred and cultural objects.

Native American groups have long complained that museums, colleges and other institutio­ns dragged out the process of returning hundreds of thousands of culturally significan­t items.

“The only exception to repatriati­on is if a museum or institutio­n can prove they received consent at the time the item was taken,” O’loughlin said. “But most institutio­ns can’t do that, of course, because these items and bodies were usually taken through violence, theft and looting.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States