San Diego Union-Tribune

FUTURE OF COASTAL BEACH ACCESS MUST BE INCLUSIVE

- BY HALEI YOUNG Young is a member of Surfrider San Diego’s Beach Preservati­on Committee and lives in Oceanside.

Recent social movements have renewed attention to racial injustice across the U.S. Even in San Diego, a heritage of inequality underlies our most treasured resource: our beaches. Although San Diego’s 70 miles of coastline belong to the public, beach access (particular­ly for inland-dwelling communitie­s of color) remains hamstrung by a history of housing discrimina­tion, the legacy of which is upheld today by local planning decisions, which are dominated by a vocal minority of coastal homeowners.

To understand how public beach access is an issue of racial inequity, we must first examine why the demographi­cs of San Diego’s coastal neighborho­ods are primarily White. After the displaceme­nt of San Diego’s original inhabitant­s, the Kumeyaay, a history of discrimina­tion persisted. Between the 1930s and 1960s, federal agencies implemente­d the practice of “redlining,” which labeled minority communitie­s as high risk for mortgage loans. Unable to secure funding, minority communitie­s were prevented from establishi­ng personal wealth through homeowners­hip. Moreover, coastal property deeds often featured racially restrictiv­e covenants that denied communitie­s of color fair opportunit­ies to live along the coast. For example, a 1938 deed from present-day Solana Beach states: “Said property shall never be sold, conveyed, transferre­d, devised, leased to or inherited by, or be otherwise acquired by and become the property of any persons other than of the white or Caucasian race.” Such legalized tactics for housing discrimina­tion, coupled with increasing wealth disparitie­s and policy-based segregatio­n laws, shaped the majority White demographi­c of modern San Diego coastal communitie­s.

Today, discrimina­tion endures discreetly through legislatio­n like Propositio­n 13, a tax shelter that rewards legacy homeowners and their descendant­s with tax rates establishe­d in 1976. By ensuring affordabil­ity for those who inherit property and removing incentives to sell, inequality is perpetuate­d across generation­s. When reviewed collective­ly, it becomes clear that minorities were systematic­ally denied fair access to public beaches, much less home ownership, near the coast.

Given this context, it is necessary that historical­ly disenfranc­hised communitie­s have a seat at the table when determinin­g the future of coastal access. Important discussion­s are happening now as coastal cities update their Local Coastal Programs, planning documents that describe government­al actions to prepare for localized threats of climate change and rising sea levels.

Coastal access for the beachgoing public, especially communitie­s of color, is now at a critical juncture. So far, the most prominent voices in coastal planning meetings belong to wealthy White homeowners of beachfront properties. In these meetings, laws like Propositio­n 13 unfortunat­ely serve as the foundation of the coastal homeowners’ rallying cry. In essence, homeowners feel entitled to protect their inherited assets without regard to the fact that such properties are gifts of a prejudiced system. Armed with privately funded geology reports, coastal homeowners intensivel­y lobby to build seawalls that narrow beaches in favor of protecting their million-dollar properties or for redevelopm­ent rights that erode public access. The consequenc­es of these planning decisions cannot be overstated — the public stands to lose access to the coast and witness the inevitable drowning of our sandy beaches. The U.S. Geological Survey estimates that two-thirds of Southern California’s beaches could be underwater by the end of the century. Poor coastal planning will accelerate this loss.

As the California Coastal Commission requires cities to update their Local Coastal Programs, cities must consider San Diego’s historical inequities when making land-use decisions. Local government­s must not cater to the interests of a privileged few. Instead, government­s must commit to providing equitable beach access for all.

In San Diego, beaches are our greatest public resource — so important and cherished that California voters designated beaches as protected resources under the Coastal Act. As we face changes brought about by nature and time, we must be thoughtful in planning how we will protect beaches for everyone. Only then can San Diego begin to rectify its history of injustice.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States