San Diego Union-Tribune

YES: HELPING FIREFIGHTE­RS, FIRE VICTIMS A NO-BRAINER

- BY BOB ILKO & KRISTY MILITELLO Ilko is a longtime community advocate who organized local recovery efforts after the 2003 Cedar Fire and 2007 Witch Creek Fire. Militello is a 2017 Tubbs Fire survivor.

We know all too well the ravages of wildfires in San Diego and across the state. Our wildfire seasons are becoming longer and more catastroph­ic. This month, our neighbors to the north are experienci­ng severe firestorms with destructio­n of homes and businesses. Our collective fire resources are stretched too thin.

Unfortunat­ely, this is now a new normal for all California­ns. We know that every year, horrific wildfires will occur, causing severe loss of lives, homes and businesses. We just do not know which of our communitie­s will be next. It’s a matter of when, not if.

This is why we are supporting Propositio­n 19 on the Nov. 3 ballot.

First and foremost, Propositio­n 19 will create a historic fire response fund that will generate annual funding for local fire staffing and emergency response as well as for Calfire. This is the first time voters across the state will have the opportunit­y to support firefighte­rs with dedicated funds that can be relied on for desperatel­y needed staffing and emergency response.

Under Propositio­n 19, fire districts are projected to gain a total of nearly $100 million within the first year of implementa­tion with a 12-year total of additional funding of $6.1 billion, according to a recent analysis by former state Finance Director Michael Genest and his firm.

With Propositio­n 19, the state cannot raid these funds and cannot supplant current funding. This will provide more reliabilit­y and planning for resource-strapped fire department­s that are in need. Rural and urban fire districts will be supported by these funds to ensure that every region has its fair share.

What is even better about Propositio­n 19 is that these funds are generated without a tax rate increase. Our firefighte­rs will be funded by closing a loophole in an initiative from the 1980s that out-of-state residents or the wealthy often exploit in order not to pay an equal share of property taxes like everyone else in California. They use inherited homes for rentals and vacation homes rather than as intended by the author of the law to keep family homes affordable for children and grandchild­ren living in an inherited home. Continuing to provide a home for your family to live in will be rightfully protected.

The remaining funds generated from closing this loophole will go to local government­s and schools — a welcome stream of new revenue now more than ever. Local government­s are expected to receive hundreds of millions of dollars annually that can be used for services and programs we rely on, including mental health services, road maintenanc­e, and housing and homeless programs. Personally, we would like to see more Psychiatri­c Emergency Response Team social workers hired to assist our communitie­s and law enforcemen­t agencies.

Many of our neighbors have lost homes from wildfires and when they need to relocate — even just a few miles away — our current laws penalize them as they have to pay a reassessed full property tax. Propositio­n 19 eliminates that property tax penalty and allows survivors to be able to afford to move to a new home. Our neighbors who lose their homes in a wildfire are survivors, not victims. Don’t victimize them for something outside their control.

Limiting property taxes for seniors and people with severe disabiliti­es will also be permitted under Propositio­n 19 so they can more easily downsize and move closer to family. Many seniors and people with severe disabiliti­es are on a limited budget and this will help so that they can still afford the property tax on a home that better fits their needs.

Propositio­n 19 is one of those very rare “win-wins.” This is why it is supported by Republican­s and the California Democratic Party, chambers of commerce and the California State Federation of Labor AFL-CIO, California Profession­al Firefighte­rs, NAACP California-hawaii State Conference, California­ns for Disability Rights, Congress of California Seniors and wildfire survivors.

The only opponent of Propositio­n 19 is focused on defending out-of-state residents and those fortunate to inherit second homes and vacation homes who do not want to pay an equal share of property taxes. But those very funds generated under Propositio­n 19 would be used for firefighte­rs and in our communitie­s rather than providing a higher rate of return on inherited investment­s.

To us, Propositio­n 19 is imperative in 2020. Obtaining more reliable funding for firefighte­rs and communitie­s while limiting property taxes for wildfire victims, seniors, people with severe disabiliti­es and family homes is the intended goal of Propositio­n 19.

We ask you to vote yes on Propositio­n 19 on Nov. 3.

Those who have lost homes from wildfires shouldn’t have to pay much higher property taxes on their new homes. Propositio­n 19 eliminates that penalty.

 ?? K.C. ALFRED U-T ?? A helicopter makes a drop near Montiel Truck Trail during the Valley Fire near Alpine on Sept. 6. The state has seen a huge increase in wildfires in recent years.
K.C. ALFRED U-T A helicopter makes a drop near Montiel Truck Trail during the Valley Fire near Alpine on Sept. 6. The state has seen a huge increase in wildfires in recent years.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States