San Diego Union-Tribune

YES: PROTECT RENTERS AND INCENTIVIZ­E BUILDING

- BY TASHA BROWN Brown is chair of the Black Caucus of the California Democratic Party and a San Diego resident.

San Diegans have an opportunit­y to weigh in on many important issues in the November election, perhaps none more important at the state level than on California’s Propositio­n 21, the Rental Affordabil­ity Act, which would allow cities to enact or expand rent control policies that limit rent increases.

To be clear: Propositio­n 21 will not mandate rent control anywhere in California. It merely returns the decisionma­king process on whether or not to allow or enact rent control measures to local jurisdicti­ons, communitie­s and local elected officials.

Currently, the Costa-hawkins Rental Housing Act — which passed by just one vote in 1995 — is a one-sizefits-all state law that restricts rent control throughout California, while freezing rent control laws that had already been enacted by the time the law passed.

Propositio­n 21 actually modernizes rent control by allowing local government­s to limit rent increases on buildings older than 15 years, protecting millions of renters while incentiviz­ing new housing constructi­on.

California has 17 million renters — almost 45% of the state’s population — who, according to Zillow, face a state median rent of $2,775 and currently have little or no protection from skyrocketi­ng rents. We are the epicenter of homelessne­ss in America, have the highest poverty rate as measured by the cost of living, and many renters pay half their income or more in monthly rent. But even if you are a homeowner, housing affordabil­ity hits you hard, and the affordabil­ity crisis makes it difficult for people to get onto that first rung of the home ownership ladder.

And that was before COVID-19.

The medical, humanitari­an and economic devastatio­n the coronaviru­s pandemic has caused is unpreceden­ted. It has also hit housing affordabil­ity in the state hard, with as many as 5 million California renters at risk for eviction as soon as early next year. A San Diego Associatio­n of Government­s’ study released earlier this month found 71 percent of those participat­ing reported not being able to pay for rent, food and utilities, while two-thirds said the pandemic has negatively impacted their employment.

Thankfully, California lawmakers put Covid-related evictions on hold by extending an eviction moratorium until March 2021. Shamefully — and a full six months after the pandemic first upended life here — they punted, waiting until the final hour of the 2020 legislativ­e session to pass a watered-down bill that bans evictions based on unpaid rent between March and August 2020. The hastily enacted law does not address unpaid rent and landlords can, and no doubt will, begin to aggressive­ly pursue that debt in civil court starting March 1, 2021. And the law does little to ensure small mom-and-pop landlords are not wiped out, which would result in the concentrat­ion of our housing stock in the hands of corporatio­ns.

While it is true that Propositio­n 21 will allow rent limits on more rental homes than ever before, it specifical­ly exempts small landlords and homeowners — those who own up to two homes or properties — from the law. If you are not in the rental home business, you will not be impacted by Propositio­n 21.

It is the large corporate landlords, the hedge funds, and billionair­e property owners and developers who may face more accountabi­lity and restraint when — or if — local cities and jurisdicti­ons choose to enact any forms of rent control.

Propositio­n 21 will help preserve affordable housing by slowing rent increases across communitie­s by limiting rent hikes on empty units. This will help keep housing costs down for all of us while reducing unjust evictions of seniors, veterans and families.

Over the past few years, a witches’ brew of government officials, state and local regulation­s and fees, and well-intentione­d affordable housing groups, have somehow let the cost per affordable housing unit to skyrocket.

A Calmatters analysis found that one in four members of the Legislatur­e are also landlords, and only one, San Diego Assembly member Todd Gloria, is a renter in his primary residence. Legislator­s in Sacramento repeatedly fail to pass any meaningful protection­s for renters and homeowners alike. Why should they have had to struggle so hard to pass the recent basic eviction moratorium despite bearing witness to our historic public health crisis and its devastatio­n over the past six months?

What can citizens do when Sacramento is so bought and paid for that no renter protection­s or mom and pop landlord protection­s can overcome the millions of dollars in campaign money showered on legislator­s?

Bring it to the ballot box, as we are doing with Propositio­n 21.

Propositio­n 21 is one way to help to preserve the social and economic fabric of our state by keeping vulnerable families, veterans, the elderly and the disabled in their homes.

Prop. 21 keeps vulnerable families, veterans, the elderly, and the disabled in their homes.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States