San Diego Union-Tribune

FACEBOOK TO ACT ON POLITICAL ADS

Company also bans intimidati­ng posts, calls to watch polls

- BY ELIZABETH DWOSKIN Dwoskin writes for The Washington Post.

Facebook said it plans to temporaril­y suspend all political and issue-based advertisin­g after polls close Nov. 3, a move the company said was intended to limit confusion, misinforma­tion and abuse of its services in the days after the presidenti­al election.

The social media giant also said it would remove calls for people to watch the polls when those posts use militarist­ic or intimidati­ng language. Executives said that the policy applies to anyone, including President Donald Trump and other politician­s. Trump has made calls for people to engage in poll-watching, including at the presidenti­al debate, and his son Donald Trump Jr. appeared in an ad last month urging people to “defend your ballot” and join an “army” to protect the polls.

Facebook executives said such language, including the words “army” and “battle” would be prohibited in the future, but the ad will not be removed retroactiv­ely.

The moves by Facebook come in the face of criticism that the company has allowed misinforma­tion and intimidati­ng speech by politician­s to run rampant, and that its policy to not factcheck political ads has created a loophole for misinforma­tion that has been repeatedly exploited. The company has previously said it will suspend running new political ads in the week before the election but will allow ads that have previously been ap

proved to continue running.

In a media call, Facebook executives gave a broad overview of the company’s efforts to combat misinforma­tion and Russian meddling since the 2016 election, when Russian operatives used its platform to sow disinforma­tion to tens of millions of voters. Since then, Facebook has marshaled significan­t resources, including designatin­g 35,000 full-time workers and content moderators to police violations of its speech policies.

But Facebook has been late to enforcemen­t, cautious, and slow to change its policies to adapt to a shifting political reality in which its rules are often purposeful­ly f louted. It delayed taking down a page calling for violence during anti-police brutality demonstrat­ions in Kenosha, Wis., and did not take action on numerous posts by Trump that civil rights activists and employees have said they think broke Facebook’s rules. On Monday, Facebook took

down a post by Trump in which he said the coronaviru­s was less lethal than the flu, the second time the company has removed one of his posts due to COVID-19 misinforma­tion.

Trump has refused to commit to a peaceful transfer of power after the election. The company has planned for at least 70 scenarios if Trump or other politician­s use their megaphones to dispute the results of the election, Facebook’s head of security policy, Na

thaniel Gleicher, said in an interview.

To combat that possibilit­y, the company has said it will send out notificati­ons on election night on Facebook and Instagram to share the latest results, in partnershi­p with Reuters. If a presidenti­al candidate or party declares premature victory, the company will apply labels to posts saying that the counting is still continuing or will label the post with the name of the winner.

“We believe we’ve done more than any other company” to combat misinforma­tion and foreign interferen­ce since 2016, Guy Rosen, Facebook’s vice president for integrity, said on a media call. “We thought it was appropriat­e to introduce these new measures as we head into the final stretch.”

Twitter has also conducted extensive preparatio­ns for the 2020 election. The company has conducted almost a dozen scenarios of both foreign and domestic disinforma­tion for election night and the week after the election. That planning includes scenarios where people try to dissuade others from voting by saying there are long lines at the polls, and a scenario in which a foreign power hacks documents and leaks them on social media, along the lines of the hacking of Hillary Clinton campaign chair John Podesta’s emails in 2016, according to interviews with executives. The company has banned all political ads and has removed or added warning labels to numerous tweets that break its rules combating voter suppressio­n and election interferen­ce.

Facebook said it has removed more than 120,000 posts on Facebook and Instagram between March and September in the United States for violating the company’s voter interferen­ce policies and has placed labels on 150 million pieces of content that have been debunked by the company’s third-party fact-checkers.

The company’s policies prohibit representa­tions about voting such as “I hear anybody with a driver’s license will get a ballot,” executives said.

 ?? MICHAEL CONROY AP ?? Facebook said it has safeguards for the election to deal with candidates who prematurel­y declare victory or contest official results and the possibilit­y of voter intimidati­on by potentiall­y armed poll watchers.
MICHAEL CONROY AP Facebook said it has safeguards for the election to deal with candidates who prematurel­y declare victory or contest official results and the possibilit­y of voter intimidati­on by potentiall­y armed poll watchers.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States