San Diego Union-Tribune

INTEL OFFICIALS WARN OF RUSSIA MEDDLING IN VOTE

Intel officials say Iran’s interferen­ce minor in comparison

- BY JULIAN E. BARNES, NICOLE PERLROTH & DAVID E. SANGER Barnes, Perlroth and Sanger write for The New York Times.

• Many in U.S. say Iran’s interferen­ce minor in comparison.

While senior Trump administra­tion officials said this week that Iran has been actively interferin­g in the presidenti­al election, many intelligen­ce officials said they remained far more concerned about Russia, which in recent days has hacked into state and local computer networks in breaches that could allow Moscow broader access to U.S. voting infrastruc­ture.

The discovery of the hacks came as U.S. intelligen­ce agencies, infiltrati­ng Russian networks themselves, have pieced together details of what they believe are Russia’s plans to interfere in the presidenti­al race in its final days or immediatel­y after the election Nov. 3. Officials did not make clear what Russia planned to do, but they said its operations would be intended to help President Donald Trump, potentiall­y by exacerbati­ng disputes around the results, especially if the race is too close to call.

There is no evidence that the Russians have changed any vote tallies or voter registrati­on informatio­n, officials said. They added that the Russian-backed hackers had penetrated the computer networks without taking further action, as they did in 2016. But U.S. officials expect that if the presidenti­al race is not called on election night, Russian groups could use their knowledge of the local computer systems to deface

websites, release nonpublic informatio­n or take similar steps that could sow chaos and doubts about the integrity of the results, according to U.S. officials briefed on the intelligen­ce.

Some U.S. intelligen­ce officials view Russia’s intentions as more significan­t than the announceme­nt Wednesday night by the director of national intelligen­ce, John Ratcliffe, that Iran has been involved in the spreading of faked, threatenin­g emails,

which were made to appear as if they came from the Proud Boys, a right-wing extremist group.

Officials briefed on the intelligen­ce said that Ratcliffe had accurately summarized the preliminar­y conclusion about Iran. But Iran’s hackers may have accomplish­ed that mission simply by assembling public informatio­n and then routing the threatenin­g emails through Saudi Arabia, Estonia and other countries to hide their tracks.

One official compared the Iranian action as single A baseball, while the Russians are major leaguers.

Nonetheles­s, both the Iranian and the Russian activity could pave the way for “perception hacks,” which are intended to leave the impression that foreign powers have greater access to the voting system than they really do. Federal officials have warned for months that small breaches could be exaggerate­d to prompt inaccurate

charges of widespread voter fraud.

Officials say Russia’s ability to change vote tallies nationwide is limited.

A hacking group believed to be operating at the behest of Russia’s Federal Security Service, the FSB — the successor agency to the Sovietera KGB — has infiltrate­d multiple state and local computer networks in recent weeks, according to officials and researcher­s. The group, known to private researcher­s as Energetic Bear or Dragonfly, has hacked into U.S. nuclear, water and power plants and airports before. While it has stopped short of shutting them down, the group is considered to be among Russia’s most formidable.

The Russian hackers were able to get inside some election administra­tors’ systems and had access to voting informatio­n. What alarmed officials was the targets, the timing — the attacks began two months ago — and the adversary, which is known for burrowing inside the supply chain of critical infrastruc­ture that Russia may want to take down in the future. The officials fear that Russia could change, delete or freeze voter data, making it harder for voters to cast ballots, invalidati­ng mail-in ballots or creating enough uncertaint­y to undermine election results.

“It’s reasonable to assume any attempt at the election systems could be for the same purpose,” said John Hultquist, director of threat analysis at FireEye, a security firm that has been tracking the Russian group’s foray into state and local systems. “This could be the reconnaiss­ance for disruptive activity.”

The threat of Iranian interferen­ce, officials said, was real and troubling. But other current and former officials said there was little doubt that Russia remained a greater threat and questioned why the focus was on Iran on Wednesday.

Administra­tion officials said the news conference reflected the urgency of the intelligen­ce about Iran.

 ?? DREW ANGERER GETTY IMAGES ?? Director of National Intelligen­ce John Ratcliffe announced Wednesday that Iran was behind emails meant to interfere in the U.S. election, but intelligen­ce officials say Russia poses a greater threat.
DREW ANGERER GETTY IMAGES Director of National Intelligen­ce John Ratcliffe announced Wednesday that Iran was behind emails meant to interfere in the U.S. election, but intelligen­ce officials say Russia poses a greater threat.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States