San Diego Union-Tribune

HIGH COURT TAKES UP CENSUS CASE

Some justices raise questions about timing of ruling

- BY ROBERT BARNES Barnes writes for The Washington Post.

Some Supreme Court justices on Monday seemed skeptical of President Donald Trump’s claim that he has the authority to exclude undocument­ed immigrants from population totals when deciding congressio­nal reapportio­nment. But they also wondered whether a definitive answer is needed now.

Chief Justice John Roberts was among those questionin­g whether the court should wait to see whether the Census Bureau, under the direction of Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, can even produce useful numbers about the undocument­ed population. Or whether the numbers the government can produce will make a difference when deciding the size of each state’s congressio­nal delegation.

Acting Solicitor General Jeffrey Wall said during Monday’s arguments that it was unclear what the department can produce in the remaining month before its report to the president is due. The Supreme Court said over the summer that the administra­tion could not ask a citizenshi­p question on the census form.

Wall said it was more likely the president would try to eliminate subsets of the undocument­ed based on existing administra­tive records, but it was unclear how successful that process would be.

Roberts said that counseled caution.

“We don’t know what the secretary is going to do. We don’t know what the presi

dent is going to do. We don’t know how many aliens will be excluded. We don’t know what the effect of that would be on apportionm­ent,” Roberts said. “All these questions would be resolved if we wait until the apportionm­ent takes place. So why aren’t we better advised to do that?”

Even though the court had granted the case on an expedited schedule to reach a decision before Jan. 1, Justice Samuel Alito seemed to agree with the chief justice.

“It could be that we are dealing with a possibilit­y that

is quite important,” he said. “It could be that this is much ado about very little. It depends on what the Census Bureau and the Department of Commerce are able to do.”

Lawyers for states protesting Trump’s intentions and organizati­ons who say they would be hurt by the change said a slight delay might give the justices more insight, but making them wait until after the president has decided the size of each state’s congressio­nal district would be too much.

They said the court could

decide now that the president simply does not have the authority to exclude those residing in the country on April 1, when the census began, even if they are undocument­ed.

“The Constituti­on and laws provide that House seats should be allocated on the basis of total population,” said New York Solicitor General Barbara Underwood, a Democrat. “The framers wanted a system that could not easily be manipulate­d. So they decided to count just the persons living in each state. The policy here would for the

first time in this nation’s history reject that choice.”

Wall acknowledg­ed that no other president has ever taken such a position. But he said the president had the authority to eliminate at least some people who were in the country illegally.

He ran into trouble even with some conservati­ve justices on that assertion, including from Justice Amy Coney Barrett.

“A lot of the historical evidence and long-standing practice really cuts against your position,” Barrett told

Wall. “And, you know, there’s evidence that in the founding era, an inhabitant was a dweller who lives or resides in a place.”

American Civil Liberties Union lawyer Dale Ho said some undocument­ed immigrants have lived in the country for years and easily are categorize­d as inhabitant­s of the state.

Ho cited an amicus brief that said undocument­ed immigrants pay $20 billion in federal taxes.

“Eighty percent are essential workers. One in four are homeowners and pay property taxes,” Ho said. “They’re our neighbors, our co-workers, and our family members. They are usual residents under any plausible definition of that term.”

Three lower courts have ruled against Trump, and a fourth said the time was not ripe for a decision on the question’s merits.

Wall told the justices it was “very unlikely” that the administra­tion could identify all of the more than 10 million people estimated to be illegally living in the country.

He said it is now trying to identify categories of people — those awaiting deportatio­n, for instance, or held in detention — who might be excluded. But Wall said it was unknown at this point whether those categories would amount to enough to change how the congressio­nal seats should be allocated.

The census report is to be submitted to the president by the end of the year. It is up to the president then to inform Congress within one week of the opening of its next session how its 435 seats are to be allocated.

 ?? CHIP SOMODEVILL­A GETTY IMAGES ?? The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments Monday in a challenge to the Trump administra­tion’s plan to exclude people living in the country without authorizat­ion from the Census Bureau’s population totals.
CHIP SOMODEVILL­A GETTY IMAGES The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments Monday in a challenge to the Trump administra­tion’s plan to exclude people living in the country without authorizat­ion from the Census Bureau’s population totals.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States