San Diego Union-Tribune

WARREN REVIVES PUSH FOR WEALTH TAX LEGISLATIO­N

Senator cites current pandemic inequities in introducin­g bill

- BY JIM TANKERSLEY Tankersley writes for The New York Times.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., introduced legislatio­n Monday that would tax the net worth of the wealthiest people in America, a proposal aimed at persuading President Joe Biden and other Democrats to fund sweeping new federal spending programs by taxing the richest Americans.

Warren’s wealth tax would apply a 2 percent tax to individual net worth — including the value of stocks, houses, boats and anything else a person owns, after subtractin­g any debts — above $50 million. It would add an additional 1 percent surcharge for net worth above $1 billion. It is co-sponsored in the House by two Democratic representa­tives, Pramila Jayapal of Washington, who leads the Congressio­nal Progressiv­e Caucus, and Brendan Boyle of Pennsylvan­ia, a moderate.

The proposal, which mirrors the plan Warren unveiled while seeking the 2020 presidenti­al nomination, is not among the top revenue-raisers that Democratic leaders are considerin­g to help offset Biden’s campaign proposals to spend trillions of dollars on infrastruc­ture, education, child care, clean energy, health care and other domestic initiative­s. Unlike Warren, Biden did not endorse a wealth tax in the 2020 Democratic presidenti­al primaries.

But Warren is pushing colleagues to pursue such a plan, which has gained popularity with the public as the richest Americans reap huge gains while 10 million Americans remain out of work as a result of the pandemic.

Polls have consistent­ly shown Warren’s proposal winning the support of more than 3 in 5 Americans, including a majority of Republican voters.

“A wealth tax is popular among voters on both sides for good reason: because they understand the system is rigged to benefit the wealthy and large corporatio­ns,” Warren said. “As Congress develops additional plans to help our economy, the wealth tax should be at the top of the list to help pay for these plans because of the huge amounts of revenue it would generate.”

She said she was confident that “lawmakers will catch up to the overwhelmi­ng majority of Americans who are demanding more fairness, more change, and who believe it’s time for a wealth tax.”

Biden did not propose any tax increases to offset the $1.9 trillion economic aid package that he hopes to sign later this month. Biden has said he will pay for long-term spending — as opposed to a temporary economic jolt — with tax increases on high earners and corporatio­ns.

Business groups and Republican­s have already begun to raise concerns about Biden’s tax plans. Those same groups are not fans of Warren’s plan, which was a centerpiec­e of her 2020 Democratic presidenti­al campaign.

Critics say the tax would be difficult for the federal government to calculate and enforce, that it would discourage investment and that it could be ruled unconstitu­tional by courts. Warren has amassed letters of support from constituti­onal scholars who say the plan would pass muster.

Warren estimated her initial proposal during the 2020 campaign would raise $2.75 trillion over a decade, which she proposed spending on education and child care, based on estimates from economists Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel Zucman at the University of California Berkeley.

The latest version, which would begin to apply in 2023 to net worth as calculated in 2022, would raise $3 trillion, Saez and Zucman calculate. Other economists, including Natasha Sarin of the University of Pennsylvan­ia and Lawrence Summers of Harvard, estimate the tax would raise significan­tly less.

Zucman and Saez say the increase in their estimate is partly the product of a pandemic recession and recovery, which has enriched some of the wealthiest Americans and exacerbate­d wealth inequality.

“Wealth at the top, particular­ly among billionair­es, has grown in the two years” since the 2019 estimate of Warren’s plan, Saez and Zucman write in a new estimate accompanyi­ng the bill.

In an email, Zucman noted that “the disconnect between wealth growth for the ultrawealt­hy and wealth growth for most Americans is not a new phenomenon: Billionair­e wealth has been growing faster than the economy for the last 40 years.”

“But,” he said, “this disconnect has widened during the pandemic. The upshot is that a wealth tax could be a significan­t source of government revenue in the years ahead.”

The White House press secretary, Jen Psaki, did not answer directly Monday when asked if Biden supported Warren’s proposal.

 ??  ?? Elizabeth Warren
Elizabeth Warren

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States