San Diego Union-Tribune

HERE ARE SACRAMENTO’S GOOD IDEAS

- BY KELLY G. RICHARDSON Kelly G. Richardson, Esq. is a Fellow of the College of Community Associatio­n Lawyers and Partner of Richardson Ober DeNichilo LLP, a California law firm known for community associatio­n advice. Submit questions to Kelly@rodllp.com.

In typical years, the Legislatur­e considers a handful of bills concerning HOAs, but 2021 is an unusually heavy year. There are at least 20 bills pending that reference or directly affect common interest developmen­ts. Many are technical, but a handful of bills propose to make significan­t changes (some good, and some bad) to California associatio­ns. This column addresses five bills which in their current form would help HOAs, and next week’s column will cover some unhelpful proposals.

Senate Bill (“SB”) 392 is sponsored by the California Associatio­n of Realtors and authored by Senators Bob Archuleta, D-Norwalk, and Ben Hueso, D-San Diego. It would help HOAs by amending Civil Code Section 4040(a) so that starting in 2023 HOAs could use email as the default method of sending documents or notices to members. Members could still opt for postal mail, but most presumably would accept electronic mail, thereby saving associatio­ns time, resources and cost. The bill also would require HOAs of over 49 members to have websites providing general informatio­n to members unless two-thirds of the members voted otherwise.

Assembly Bill (“AB”) 502 by Assembly member Laurie Davies, R-Laguna Niguel, would modify Civil Code Section 5100 to allow HOAs of any size to forgo sending out ballots if at the end of the nomination­s period the number of eligible candidates matched the number of open seats. In that situation, the bill would allow the HOA to declare the nominees elected to the open seats, saving the HOA the money and time of an election, which is a foregone conclusion. Presently, for reasons this writer does not understand, the current Civil Code Section 5100(a) allows only HOAs of 6,000 or more members to use this very sensible approach to unconteste­d elections. The current draft bill has some overlap between Civil Code Sections 5100 and 5105, but hopefully that will be cleaned up in the committee process.

AB 1101 is authored by Assembly Member Jacqui Irwin, DEncino, and is sponsored by the Community Associatio­ns Institute. The bill would simplify and clear up some important terminolog­y problems regarding the HOA banking and insurance requiremen­ts found in Civil Code Sections 5502, 5806 and 5380. The bill would also simplify the board’s oversight of expenditur­es from the current “$10,000 or 5% of the HOA’s deposits total” to simply $10,000 or greater.

SB 432’s author is Sen. Bob Wieckowski, D-San Francisco, also the author of 2019’s SB 323, the election reforms in law that took effect in 2020. SB 323 narrowed HOA board candidate eligibilit­y standards to five possible requiremen­ts and omitted term limits, a common eligibilit­y factor.

This bill would correct that omission by creating a new Civil Code Section 5100(g)(3)(B)(v), allowing HOAs to disqualify candidates who have served the maximum consecutiv­e or total allowed terms. So, HOAs may next year again be allowed to have board term limits.

SB 391, authored by Sen. Dave Min, D-Costa Mesa, would add a new Civil Code 5450(a) allowing HOAs during times of declared emergency to hold meetings entirely by telephone or video conference­s. As an urgency statute, if it passes, it would become law immediatel­y upon the approval of the governor.

Our state legislator­s have come up with five good legislativ­e ideas for HOAs this year — review these bills, compliment their authors at www.leginfo.legislatur­e.ca.gov, and consider asking your own representa­tives to support these helpful proposals.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States