San Diego Union-Tribune

COMPANIES GAVE $50M TO VOTING RESTRICTIO­N BACKERS

Top donors include AT&T, Philip Morris, Comcast, Walmart

- BY BRIAN SLODYSKO

When executives from Coca-Cola and Delta Air Lines spoke out against Georgia’s new voting law as unduly restrictiv­e last week, it seemed to signal a new activism springing from corporate America.

But if leaders of the nation’s most prominent companies are going to reject lawmakers who support restrictiv­e voting measures, they will have to abruptly reverse course.

State legislator­s across the country who have pushed for new voting restrictio­ns, and also seized on former President Donald Trump’s baseless claims of election fraud, have reaped more than $50 million in corporate donations in recent years, according to a new report by Public Citizen, a Washington-based government watchdog group.

Telecom giant AT&T was the most prolific, donating over $800,000 since 2015 to authors of proposed restrictio­ns, co-sponsors of such measures, or those who voted in favor of the bills, the report found. Other top donors during the same period include Comcast, Philip Morris USA, UnitedHeal­th Group, Walmart, Verizon, General Motors and Pfizer.

The money may not have been given with voting laws in mind, but it nonetheles­s helped cement Republican control in statehouse­s where many of the prohibitiv­e measures are now moving forward.

Whether companies con

tinue to give to these lawmakers will test how far riskaverse corporate leaders are willing to go in their increasing­ly forceful criticism of the restrictiv­e efforts, which voting rights groups have excoriated as an attack on democracy.

“It really is corporate America, as a whole, that is funding these politician­s,” said Mike Tanglis, one of the authors of the report. “It seems many are trying to hide under a rock and hope that this issue passes.”

More than 120 companies detailed in the report previously said they would rethink their donations to members of Congress who, acting on the same falsehoods as the state lawmakers, objected to the certificat­ion of President Joe Biden’s win following the deadly attack on the U.S. Capitol by Trump supporters.

The tension is most evident now in Georgia, where a far-reaching new voting law has drawn an intense national scrutiny, prompting the criticism from Delta and Coca-Cola. On Friday, MLB announced it would no longer host the 2021 All-Star Game in Atlanta.

Yet it’s unclear whether this aggressive new posture will extend to corporate campaign donation practices. And early indicators show there is risk.

Georgia’s Republican­controlled House voted to strip Delta of a tax break worth tens of millions of dollars annually for their criticism of the new law, though the action was rendered moot after the GOP Senate failed to take it up before the legislativ­e session adjourned.

What is certain, though, is that withholdin­g corporate donations to state-level candidates, like many companies did at the federal level, would have a far greater impact in statehouse­s.

“A contributi­on of $5,000 to a U.S. senator who is raising $30 million is a drop in a bucket. But in some of these state races, a few thousand

dollars can buy a lot of ad time,” said Tanglis. “If corporate America is going to say that (Trump’s) lie is unacceptab­le on the federal level, what about on the state level?”

Public Citizen analyzed about 245 voting restrictio­n bills proposed before March 1. They culled a list of sponsors and co-sponsors, while also analyzing vote roll calls. Then they cross-referenced the data with state-level donation records dating back to 2015, which included money from company political action committees, as well as direct contributi­ons from corporate treasuries. Among their findings:

• Companies donated at least $50 million to lawmakers who supported voting restrictio­ns, including $22 million in the 2020 campaign cycle.

• At least 81 Fortune 100 companies have given a combined total of $7.7 million to supporters of the restrictio­ns.

• Nearly half of all Fortune 500 companies donated a combined total of $12.8 million to supporters of the restrictio­ns.

• About three-quarters of the companies that changed their donation policies after the U.S. Capitol attack have also given to lawmakers who supported voting rights restrictio­ns.

• More than 60 companies have given at least $100,000 to lawmakers who supported the restrictio­ns.

• Separately, industry groups and trade associatio­ns

contribute­d an additional $36 million to the lawmakers, $16 million of which was given during the 2020 cycle.

In response, AT&T said “the right to vote is sacred” but declined to say whether the company would withhold donations to state lawmakers as they did for members of Congress who objected to Biden’s win.

“We understand that election laws are complicate­d, not our company’s expertise and ultimately the responsibi­lity of elected officials. But, as a company, we have a responsibi­lity to engage,“AT&T CEO John Stankey said in a statement.

Verizon CEO Hans Vestberg said in a statement, “We strongly oppose the passage of any legislatio­n or the adoption of any measure that would make it harder“to vote. But he stopped short of pledging any specific action.

Comcast said in a statement that “efforts to limit or impede access to this vital constituti­onal right for any citizen are not consistent with our values.” The company would not comment on whether it would evaluate its giving to lawmakers who support the measures.

Altria, the parent company of Philip Morris USA, said in a statement that “every eligible voter should be able to exercise their right to vote” and pledged to monitor lawmakers’ “alignment with our political contributi­on guiding principles when making future contributi­on decisions.”

Other companies listed in the report declined to comment or did not respond to inquiries from The Associated Press.

On Monday, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell urged companies to resist what he called a “coordinate­d campaign by powerful and wealthy people to mislead and bully the American people.”

“Our private sector must stop taking cues from the Outrage-Industrial Complex,” the Kentucky Republican said in a statement. “Americans do not need or want big business to amplify or react to every manufactur­ed controvers­y with frantic left-wing signaling.”

Pressure has been particular­ly intense in Georgia, where Republican Gov. Brian Kemp recently signed a sweeping new law that bans people from handing out food or water to voters waiting in line and allows the Republican-controlled State Election Board to remove and replace county election officials, among many other provisions.

Two of the top corporate contributi­on recipients detailed in Public Citizen’s report were among the sponsors of the measure.

Since 2015, Republican state Sen. Jeff Mullis has collected more than $869,000 in donation from corporate PACs. Among his top corporate donors were AT&T ($15,900) and UnitedHeal­th Group ($12,900), according to the report. Mullis is chair of the Georgia Senate’s Rules Committee, which plays a key role in determinin­g which bills make it to the floor for a vote.

Republican state Sen. Butch Miller, another sponsor of the bill, has received at least $729,000 in corporate donations since 2015. Among his top corporate givers are UnitedHeal­th Group ($15,700) and AT&T ($13,600), the report states.

Miller and Mullis did not respond to requests for comment.

 ?? LYNNE SLADKY AP FILE ?? Telecom giant AT&T was the top donor cited in the report, giving more than $800,000 since 2015.
LYNNE SLADKY AP FILE Telecom giant AT&T was the top donor cited in the report, giving more than $800,000 since 2015.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States