San Diego Union-Tribune

BIDEN TO WITHDRAW AFGHANISTA­N TROOPS BY SEPT. 11

Exit timeline extends beyond May 1 deadline establishe­d by Trump

- BY MISSY RYAN & KAREN DEYOUNG

President Joe Biden will withdraw all American troops from Afghanista­n over the coming months, people familiar with the plans said, completing the military exit by or before the 20th anniversar­y of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks that first drew the United States into its longest war.

The decision, which Biden is expected to announce today, will keep thousands of U.S. forces in the country beyond the May 1 exit deadline that the Trump administra­tion negotiated last year with the Taliban, according to a senior administra­tion official who briefed reporters Tuesday under rules of anonymity set by the White House.

While the Taliban has vowed to renew attacks on U.S. and NATO personnel if foreign troops are not out by the deadline, they made no initial statement in response to the announceme­nt, and it is not clear if the militants will follow through with the earlier threats given Biden’s plan for a phased withdrawal between now and September.

Officially, there are 2,500 U.S. troops in Afghanista­n, although the number fluctuates and is currently about 1,000 more than that. There are also up to an additional 7,000 foreign forces in the coalition there, the majority of them NATO troops.

Biden’s decision comes after an administra­tion review of U.S. options in Afghanista­n, where U.S.-midwived peace talks have failed to advance as hoped and the Taliban remains a potent force despite two decades of effort by the United States to defeat the militants and establish stable, democratic governance. The war has cost trillions of dollars in addition to the lives of

more than 2,000 U.S. service members and at least 100,000 Afghan civilians.

“This is the immediate, practical reality that our policy review discovered,” said one person familiar with the closed-door deliberati­ons who like others spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss policy planning. “If we break the May 1st deadline negotiated by the previous administra­tion with no clear plan to exit, we will be back at war with the Taliban, and that was not something President Biden believed was in the national interest.”

The goal is to move to “zero” troops by September, the senior administra­tion official said. “This is not conditions-based. The president has judged that a conditions-based approach ... is a recipe for staying in Afghanista­n forever. He has reached the conclusion that the United States will complete its drawdown, and will remove its forces from Afghanista­n before September 11.”

The decision highlights the trade-offs the Biden administra­tion is willing to make to shift the U.S. global focus away from the counterins­urgency campaigns that dominated the post-9/ 11 world to current priorities, including increasing military competitio­n with China.

In addition to major domestic challenges, “the reality is that the United States has big strategic interests in the world,” the person familiar with the deliberati­ons said, “like nonprolife­ration, like an increasing­ly aggressive and assertive Russia, like North Korea and Iran, whose nuclear programs pose a threat to the United States,” as well as China. “The main threats to the American homeland are actually from other places: from Africa, from parts of the Middle East — Syria and Yemen.”

“Afghanista­n just does not rise to the level of those other threats at this point,” the person said. “That does not mean we’re turning away from Afghanista­n. We are going to remain committed to the government, remain committed diplomatic­ally. But in terms of where we will be investing force posture, our blood and treasure, we believe that other priorities merit that investment.”

Immediate reaction in Washington was divided. In a statement on the Senate floor, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell called it “reckless” and “a grave mistake. It is retreat in the face of an enemy that has not yet been vanquished and abdication of American leadership.”

McConnell pointed to a 2019 amendment — passed by a supermajor­ity of senators when Trump called for full withdrawal from Syria — that requires the administra­tion to “certify that conditions have been met for the enduring defeat of alQaida and (the Islamic State) before initiating any significan­t withdrawal of United States forces from Syria or Afghanista­n.”

“Can President Biden certify that right now?” McConnell asked.

But while McConnell cited “broad political support” for an ongoing military presence in Afghanista­n, other lawmakers called it the right decision. “There are no good, easy decisions here,” said House Armed Services Committee Chairman Adam Smith, D-Wash. “Given the options, I think this is the best choice.”

“We cannot impose a solution on Afghanista­n,” Smith said in an interview. “I don’t doubt for a second there is going to continue to be violence and turbulence,” but the main transnatio­nal terrorist threat is now elsewhere. “We can only be in so many places. We have to make choices, and those choices are not easy. It’s not as if we didn’t put in the time in Afghanista­n,” he said.

Some officials have warned that a U.S. exit will lead to the collapse of the Kabul government while jeopardizi­ng gains made over the past two decades in health, education and women’s rights.

Biden administra­tion officials say the United States intends to remain closely involved in the peace process and will continue to provide humanitari­an aid and assistance to the Afghan government and security forces, which remains almost totally dependent on foreign support.

“What we will not do is use our troops as bargaining chips,” the senior official said.

Biden, who argued unsuccessf­ully during the Obama administra­tion for a small, counterter­rorism-focused presence, had already hinted that the United States would remain for only a limited time beyond the May 1 deadline.

Late last month, he said he did not expect U.S. troops to be deployed there next year. “We will leave,” he said at a White House news conference. “But the question is when we leave.”

Administra­tion officials were in the process of notifying officials in NATO nations as well as Afghan officials and the Taliban on Tuesday. Afghan President Ashraf Ghani, in a statement from his office, said he would have no statement until an upcoming phone call with Biden “to officially share details of the new withdrawal plan.”

The senior official also said the Taliban had been informed of the decision, reminded of its commitment­s under the Trump agreement, and warned against attacking departing U.S. forces. Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said that the militants would make an official response “when the U.S. formally announces” its plans, presumably by Biden on Wednesday.

The official said that the U.S. withdrawal would be fully coordinate­d with NATO and other coalition partners. Citing NATO’s “in together, out together” mantra, the senior official said “we will take the time we need to execute that, and no more time than that.” The official said withdrawal would begin before May 1, and might well be completed before September.

 ?? JOHN MOORE GETTY IMAGES ?? U.S. Army soldiers from the 10th Mountain Division return home from a ninemonth deployment to Afghanista­n in December at Fort Drum, N.Y.
JOHN MOORE GETTY IMAGES U.S. Army soldiers from the 10th Mountain Division return home from a ninemonth deployment to Afghanista­n in December at Fort Drum, N.Y.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States