San Diego Union-Tribune

CDC: OMICRON IS LESS PREVALENT THAN ESTIMATED

Variant accounts for 59% of U.S. cases, not 73%, it reports

- BY SABRINA IMBLER & EMILY ANTHES Imbler and Anthes write for The New York Times.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated that the Omicron variant now accounts for roughly 59 percent of all COVID cases in the United States, a significan­t decrease from the agency’s previous estimate. The update shows how hard it is to track the fast-spreading variant in real time and how poorly the agency has communicat­ed its uncertaint­y, experts said.

Last week, the CDC said that Omicron accounted for 73 percent of variants circulatin­g in the United States in the week ending Dec. 18. But in its revision, the agency said the variant accounted for about 23 percent of cases that week.

In other words, Delta, which has dominated U.S. infections since summer, still reigned in the United States that week. That could mean that a significan­t number of current COVID hospitaliz­ations were driven by infections from Delta, Dr. Scott Gottlieb, a former commission­er of the Food and Drug Administra­tion, suggested on Twitter. Hospitaliz­ations typically lag several weeks behind initial infections.

Experts said they were not surprised by the revisions, given that the CDC’s estimates are rough guesses, with a wide range of possible values known as “confidence intervals.” Cases of Omicron can only be confirmed by genetic sequencing, which is performed on just a portion of samples across the country.

And Omicron is still spreading extremely fast.

Still, they said the CDC did a poor job communicat­ing the uncertaint­y of its estimates. The agency has had a series of missteps during the pandemic, including sending out botched tests early on and shifting guidance on masking. On Monday, when it halved the recommende­d isolation period to five days for those who test positive but show no symptoms, critics objected that there was no requiremen­t to test before returning to work.

Dr. Jerome Adams, who served as the U.S. surgeon general under former President Donald Trump, wrote on Twitter on Tuesday that while he respected the CDC, he disagreed with its decision on isolation periods.

He also criticized the new guidance’s lack of a test-out option or recommenda­tion for higher-quality masks.

David O’Connor, a virus expert at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, said of the Omicron estimate, “The 73 percent got a lot more attention than the confidence intervals, and I think this is one example among many where scientists are trying to project an air of confidence about what’s going to happen.”

O’Connor said he initially thought the initial 73 percentage point estimate “seemed

high.” The agency came up with the estimate based on a “relatively small number of sequences,” he added.

“It’s like playing Name That Tune and trying to say, based on just the first note, if the song is ‘Ice Ice Baby’ by Vanilla Ice or ‘Under Pressure,’” O’Connor said. “Without more data, it can be really hard to know which one it’s going to be.”

The new estimate of 59 percent is also a rough calculatio­n, experts said, and will most likely be revised.

“I just want people to be very aware that that is an estimate; that’s not actually from sequence-confirmed cases,” said Nathan Grubaugh, a public health researcher at the Yale School of Public Health. “With Omicron in particular, it’s been very difficult to have any sort of projection­s, because things are changing just so so rapidly.”

Grubaugh, who is tracking probable Omicron samples in Connecticu­t, said that the variant makes up more than 80 percent of cases there, though he also notes that the country is heterogeno­us and the variant likely has a different prevalence

in different places.

“I don’t know how the CDC built their algorithm, but human beings made these programs, and humans are fallible,” said Massimo Caputi, a molecular virus expert at the Florida Atlantic University School of Medicine. “At the end of the day, you can predict as much as you want, but you need to look at the numbers you have in your hand.”

O’Connor, who is tracking Omicron in Wisconsin, said the variant made up half the cases on the University of Wisconsin-Madison campus in just three days. “If I was making a betting prediction, it wasn’t so much that the number 73 percent was wrong, but the timing to get there was wrong,” he said.

More precise numbers will be needed to smartly distribute COVID treatments. One of the great challenges of Omicron is the variant’s ability to thwart two of the three monoclonal antibody treatments, which can prevent serious illness in COVID-19 patients.

 ?? TED S. WARREN AP ?? DeMarcus Hicks, who is working as a contractor with the Federal Emergency Management Agency, gives a patient a Pfizer booster shot in Federal Way, Wash.
TED S. WARREN AP DeMarcus Hicks, who is working as a contractor with the Federal Emergency Management Agency, gives a patient a Pfizer booster shot in Federal Way, Wash.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States