San Diego Union-Tribune

CALIF. COVID GUN STORE SHUTDOWNS RULED ILLEGAL

Appeals panel says closures violated Second Amendment

- BY DON THOMPSON Thompson writes for The Associated Press.

Two California counties violated the Constituti­on’s right to keep and bear arms when they shut down gun and ammunition stores in 2020 as nonessenti­al businesses during the coronaviru­s pandemic, a federal appeals court ruled Thursday.

Officials in Los Angeles and Ventura counties had separately won lower court decisions saying gun stores were not exempt from broader shutdown orders aimed at limiting the spread of the coronaviru­s early in the pandemic.

A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected both lower court rulings.

The Second Amendment “means nothing if the government can prohibit all persons from acquiring any firearm or ammunition,” Judge Lawrence VanDyke wrote. “But that’s what happened in this case.”

Because buyers can obtain guns only by personally going to gun stores in California,

Ventura County’s 48-day closure of gun shops, ammunition shops and firing ranges “wholly prevented law-abiding citizens in the County from realizing their right to keep and bear arms,” he wrote.

This, he noted, while bike shops were among those allowed to remain open as essential businesses. The panel adopted the same reasoning in the Los Angeles County case, though the closure there was for 11 days.

The decision holds that government­s “cannot use a crisis to trample on the Constituti­onal rights of citizens,” said Michael Jean, director of the National Rifle Associatio­n’s Office of Litigation Counsel, which sued in the Los Angeles County case. It also sued Alameda, Contra Costa, Santa Clara and San Mateo counties over their restrictio­ns in Northern California, but the last three were dismissed from the lawsuit when they repealed their orders.

Similar restrictio­ns were imposed in 10 other states, according to the Firearms Policy Coalition, another gun-owner rights group that sued: Connecticu­t, Georgia, Massachuse­tts, Michigan, Mississipp­i, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina and Virginia.

Ventura County “believes the case was correctly decided at the District Court level and is disappoint­ed with the three-judge panel’s decision,” county spokespers­on Ashley Bautista said in an email. Officials are reviewing the decision and “evaluating our options and next steps.”

Los Angeles County Sheriff Alex Villanueva and Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti, named plaintiffs in the case, did not immediatel­y comment.

Losing parties can generally ask the full 9th Circuit to review the ruling by the three judges, or petition the U.S. Supreme Court. The nation’s high court has been deemed more sympatheti­c to gun owners in recent years.

Firearms Policy Coalition vice president of programs Adam Kraut said in a statement that the cases resulted “when authoritar­ian government­s used COVID as an excuse to attack Second Amendment rights.”

The 9th Circuit opinions “confirm our claims that the COVID closures of gun stores and firing ranges violated the Second Amendment rights of California­ns,” he said.

 ?? RINGO H.W. CHIU AP FILE ?? People wait to enter a gun store in Culver City on March 15, 2020. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said gun store closures during the pandemic were illegal.
RINGO H.W. CHIU AP FILE People wait to enter a gun store in Culver City on March 15, 2020. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said gun store closures during the pandemic were illegal.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States