San Diego Union-Tribune

CAN THERE BE DOUBLE JEOPARDY IN HOAS?

- BY KELLY G. RICHARDSON Richardson is a Fellow of the College of Community Associatio­n Lawyers and Partner of Richardson Ober DeNichilo LLP, a California law firm known for community associatio­n advice. Submit questions to Kelly@rodllp.com. Past columns at

Q:If HOA failed to send a letter to homeowners within 15 days as required by Civil Code 5855, may the HOA simply ignore that and hold another meeting or as many as they want, thereby removing the possibilit­y if a homeowner’s using 5855 as a defense?

P.M., WALNUT CREEK

A:

As your question implies,

associatio­ns must in writing notify a member no later than 15 days after a disciplina­ry (or common area damage reimbursem­ent) hearing of any action taken. Civil Code Section 5855 has several requiremen­ts that must be met, or per 5855(d) such action is “void.” “Void” means the HOA cannot enforce the disciplina­ry action or reimbursem­ent claim.

If the HOA errs in its process, it can restart the process (hopefully doing it correctly this time). There is no “double jeopardy” ban in the HOA world banning a second “prosecutio­n,” unlike government criminal enforcemen­t, so the disciplina­ry process can be restarted. Some lawyers, even HOA lawyers, contend that various constituti­onal rights apply to the “accused” of HOA violations, but this is clearly wrong — or juries would decide these violations, not boards.

Remember, these hearings are a group of neighbors trying to stop unneighbor­ly behavior. Nobody is being incarcerat­ed here!

Q:

We have a resident who

likes to instigate and fight with community members. Now she has the membership list and is sending out hate speech and targeting certain residents. She is also a “racist” and it is awful. What can be done? Our attorney says nothing.

E.E., LAGUNA NIGUEL A:

I am very sorry to learn of the hateful activity by your neighbor. If that hate is directed at residents because of their membership in one of the many protected classes in California (race, religion, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientatio­n, and many more), the state Fair Housing regulation­s and H.U.D. regulation­s ban such activity as discrimina­tory. Section 12120 of the state regulation­s declare such discrimina­tion illegal. Section 12010(c) requires the HOA to take what action it can to prevent such discrimina­tion or it will be liable for that discrimina­tion. By the way, pursuant to Section 12005(t) of the regulation­s, HOAs, their board members AND their managers are all defined as the “owner” of the property for purposes of Fair Housing liability.

The HOA is only responsibl­e to do what it can do under its documents, but it must at least try — so, and contrary to your attorney’s statement, it cannot just do nothing. The Fair Housing authoritie­s expect the HOA to investigat­e the alleged discrimina­tion and determine if illegal harassment happened. Then, the HOA is expected to try to do what it can to stop the behavior. This could be a letter from the HOA’s manager, board or attorney. If the behavior is egregious enough that it constitute­s a nuisance under the HOA CC&Rs, the HOA’s legal counsel may analyze whether that is a source of potential action.

The residents victimized by this behavior have their own rights against the harasser, including complainin­g to the DFEH and even filing their own claim for discrimina­tion. Hopefully the HOA can head off that kind of action by showing that such conduct will not be tolerated in your HOA community.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States