San Diego Union-Tribune

BIDEN BANS MOST ANTI-PERSONNEL LAND MINE USE

Exception made for devices along Demilitari­zed Zone

- BY MICHAEL CROWLEY & JOHN ISMAY Crowley and Ismay write for The New York Times.

The United States on Tuesday limited its military’s use of land mines worldwide, except for on the Korean Peninsula, meeting President Joe Biden’s campaign pledge to undo a Trump-era policy that he had called “reckless.”

The move effectivel­y returns to a 2014 policy establishe­d by the Obama administra­tion that forbade the use of anti-personnel land mines except in defense of South Korea. The Trump administra­tion loosened those restrictio­ns in 2020, citing a new focus on strategic competitio­n with major powers with large armies.

Human rights groups have long condemned antiperson­nel land mines — small explosive weapons that typically detonate after an unsuspecti­ng victim steps on them — as a leading cause of preventabl­e civilian casualties. Land mines kill thousands of people per year, many of them children, often long after conflicts have ended and the munitions are forgotten.

A White House statement Tuesday said that the move would put the United

States back among “the vast majority of countries around the world in committing to limit the use of anti-personnel land mines” and closely align U.S. policy with a 1997 treaty signed by 133 countries to ban the weapons entirely. The United States never signed the treaty, known as the Ottawa Convention, and the White House stopped short of saying it would seek to join the pact.

One reason is that the Biden administra­tion is maintainin­g an exception for use of land mines along the Demilitari­zed Zone, the 2.5-mile-wide buffer that has divided North and South Korea since 1953. The United States placed thousands of mines there during the Cold

War to help deter an overwhelmi­ng ground invasion from the North.

South Korea took custody of the minefields in October 1991, according to a spokespers­on for U.S. Forces Korea. But some proponents for banning land mines say that if the United States were party to the Ottawa Convention, it would face restrictio­ns on its cooperatio­n with South Korea’s military as a result of the presence of mines in the area.

Those advocates had hoped for quicker action on Biden’s campaign promise, which was held up because of a Pentagon policy review dating to at least April 2021. In 2020, Biden’s campaign told Vox that he would “promptly roll back this deeply misguided decision.”

Last June, Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., sent a letter to Biden asking him to reinstate the 2014 policy as a first step toward fully renouncing the weapons everywhere and joining the Ottawa treaty.

“The Department of Defense should be directed to move expeditiou­sly in fully implementi­ng and institutio­nalizing the policy,” Leahy said in a statement emailed to reporters Monday. “This is long overdue recognitio­n that the grave humanitari­an and political costs of using these weapons far exceed their limited military utility.”

The senator also urged the White House to take further steps to put the United States on a path to join treaties banning anti-personnel mines and cluster munitions. “Neither of these indiscrimi­nate weapons, the horrific consequenc­es of which we are seeing in Ukraine today, belong in the arsenals of civilized nations,” he said in the statement.

Biden administra­tion officials took the opportunit­y to condemn Russia’s use of land mines in Ukraine, where the munitions “have caused extensive harm to civilians and civilian objects,” Adrienne Watson, a spokespers­on for the National Security Council, said in a statement Tuesday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States