San Diego Union-Tribune

GOVERNOR SIGNS REPEAL OF ANTI-LOITERING LAW

Newsom reiterates sex work not being decriminal­ized

- BY HANNAH WILEY Wiley writes for the Los Angeles Times.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Thursday signed a controvers­ial bill to repeal a provision of state law that bans loitering for the intent to sell sex — a proposal that deeply divided Democrats in the Legislatur­e and pitted transgende­r rights activists against advocates to stop human traffickin­g.

Anti-loitering laws have been contentiou­s nationwide, in part because they are often vague in their definition of what constitute­s loitering, which gives police wide latitude to arrest or disperse individual­s. While New York state and cities such as Seattle have repealed antiloiter­ing laws, California now becomes the largest state to do so.

In his signing statement released on Friday, Newsom alluded to the difficult political debate around the bill, but noted that it “does not legalize prostituti­on.”

“It simply revokes provisions of the law that have led to disproport­ionate harassment of women and (transgende­r) adults,” Newsom wrote. “While I agree with the author’s intent and I am signing this legislatio­n, we must be cautious about its implementa­tion. My Administra­tion will monitor crime and prosecutio­n trends for any possible unintended consequenc­es and will act to mitigate any such consequenc­es.”

Lawmakers initially passed Senate Bill 357 in September, but state Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, delayed sending it to Newsom until June during Pride Month, in order to buy time to address concerns from the opposition and present the case for why the measure should become law.

“Everyone — no matter their race, gender or how they make a living — deserves to feel safe on our streets,” Wiener said in a statement.

The bill voids a misdemeano­r law against loitering in public for the purpose of engaging in prostituti­on, which supporters of SB 357 said police use to disproport­ionately discrimina­te against sex workers and LGBTQ people, many of whom are Black and brown. They raised concerns that the law worsens conditions for workers and leads to unsafe and violent situations, especially against transgende­r women.

“This is a piece of legislatio­n that will ensure that people are safe on the streets and that we do not continue to be harassed and oppressed by law enforcemen­t,” said Bamby Salcedo, president and CEO of the TransLatin@ Coalition. “It is important to recognize that sex work and sex workers need to have dignity, and that we are also safe as we navigate the streets of the state of California.”

Opponents have argued that the bill takes California down the path toward full decriminal­ization of sex work, and that police use the loitering law to hold johns and pimps accountabl­e for allegedly taking advantage of young women and girls.

“The bill is dangerous, and it’s the first step toward full legalizati­on of prostituti­on. A false narrative was used when the bill was drafted,” Rima Nashashibi, founder and president of Global Hope 365, a nonprofit that focuses on gender-related issues, said during a news conference. “We reject the idea that decriminal­izing loitering will make conditions safer for women and girls who are victims of sex traffickin­g.”

While the proposal comfortabl­y passed the full Senate last fall, the Assembly approved it with only one vote to spare. Several Democrats joined Republican­s in opposing the measure, while some withheld their vote. That put moremodera­te Democrats at odds not only with members of their own caucus, but with the civil liberty and LGBTQ advocacy organizati­ons with whom they’re often aligned.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States