San Diego Union-Tribune

CONN. JUDGE REJECTS BID BY JONES TO REDUCE DAMAGES

- BY EDMUND H. MAHONY Mahony writes for Tribune News Service.

In a short and pointed ruling, the judge who presided over conspiracy theorist Alex Jones’ Connecticu­t Sandy Hook defamation trial rejected on Thursday his arguments that the jury’s $1.4 billion damages award should be reduced and a new trial ordered.

The six-page decision by Superior Court Judge Barbara Bellis means the jury verdict returned at the conclusion of a two-week trial in September and October stands and what Jones has signaled will be years of appeals can begin.

Jones, through his lawyer Norm Pattis, had argued that the jury’s potentiall­y recordsett­ing damages award was excessive and based on emotion rather than evidence. And he asked that the verdict be set aside, arguing that the cumulative weight of Bellis’ rulings against Jones both before and during trial amounted to a “complete abdication” of the court’s duty to assure a fair trial.

In her decision, Bellis said Jones’ post-trial motions to reduce damages and win a new trial were “conclusory” and “unsupporte­d by any evidence or case law,” or “largely conclusory and not adequately briefed.”

The judge also pointed to decisions by Jones, based on what he criticized as adverse rulings by a “kangaroo court,” not to testify in his defense and to forgo most cross examinatio­n of witnesses against him.

“The court rejects these arguments, as well as the other arguments put forth by the defendants, who chose to conduct limited cross examinatio­n of the plaintiffs’ witnesses and to ‘boycott’ the trial,” Bellis wrote.

Pattis called Bellis’ ruling “disappoint­ing but hardly surprising given the course of proceeding­s in the case.”

Jones and his broadcasti­ng and retail sales business, Free Speech Systems, were sued by 15 people in Connecticu­t — parents, spouses and siblings of the 20 first-graders and six educators murdered when a gunman shot his way into Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown with an assault rifle, and an FBI agent who was part of the law enforcemen­t response on Dec. 14, 2012.

They claimed their lives were shattered by threats and harassment from complete strangers who believed years of bombastic broadcasts to an audience of millions claiming, falsely, that the shooting was staged and they, along with their murdered children, were actors in a hoax perpetrate­d to win support for outlawing gun ownership.

The families presented evidence that Jones had audience and sales data that showed both increased dramatical­ly when he used his Infowars program to promote the phony conspiracy theory.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States