San Diego Union-Tribune

JUDGE REJECTS BID TO HAVE AFGHAN BANK FUNDS SEIZED

Relatives of 9/11 victims sought $3.5B frozen by U.S.

- BY CHARLIE SAVAGE Savage writes for The New York Times.

A federal judge in New York on Tuesday rejected the effort by relatives of victims of the Sept. 11 attacks to seize $3.5 billion in frozen Afghan central bank funds to pay off judgment debts owed by the Taliban, dealing a sharp blow to a high-stakes bid to compensate the families for their losses in the worst terrorist attack in U.S. history.

In a 30-page opinion, Judge George B. Daniels of the Southern District of New York ruled that federal courts lacked legal jurisdicti­on to seize the funds. He also said that awarding them to the families would be unconstitu­tional because it would mean effectivel­y recognizin­g the militants as the legitimate government of Afghanista­n.

The Sept. 11 families and insurance companies “are entitled to collect on their default judgments and be made whole for the worst terrorist attack in our nation’s history, but they cannot do so with the funds of the central bank of Afghanista­n,” Daniels wrote.

Under federal law and the Constituti­on, he added, “the Taliban — not the former Islamic Republic of Afghanista­n or the Afghan people — must pay for the Taliban’s liability in the 9/11 attacks.”

The ruling by Daniels adopted the recommenda­tion of a magistrate judge, Sarah Netburn, who analyzed the matter in a report in August that also found that the families were not entitled to the funds. But it left the decision to him.

Daniels’ opinion was the first definitive ruling in a complex saga at the intersecti­on of foreign policy, internatio­nal economics, counterter­rorism and domestic politics, a situation arising from a country being seized by a terrorist organizati­on and left without a government that is recognized as legitimate.

In a statement, Lee Wolosky, a lawyer for the lead group of relatives who had sought those funds, said they would appeal the ruling.

“This decision deprives over 10,000 members of the 9/11 community of their right to collect compensati­on from the Taliban, a terrorist group which was found liable for the 9/11 attacks on America,” Wolosky said.

When the government of Afghanista­n collapsed as the Taliban took over in August 2021, there was about $7 billion in Afghan central bank funds deposited at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. A group of Sept. 11 families that years earlier had sued the Taliban for their losses, winning a default judgment when the militants failed to show up in court, then moved to seize the funds to pay off the judgment debt.

Last February, President Joe Biden froze the funds, reserving about half to be spent on helping the Afghan people while leaving the remaining $3.5 billion for the families to keep going after in court.

It is not clear what will happen to the $3.5 billion the president set aside for the families to keep pursuing if their appeals ultimately fail. One possibilit­y is that Biden or a successor could use executive power to add it to the half he set aside for Afghans and which is now controlled by a special fund in Switzerlan­d.

 ?? JOHN MINCHILLO AP FILE ?? A mourner prays at the National September 11 Memorial and Museum in New York City on Sept. 11, 2020, the 19th anniversar­y of the terror attacks.
JOHN MINCHILLO AP FILE A mourner prays at the National September 11 Memorial and Museum in New York City on Sept. 11, 2020, the 19th anniversar­y of the terror attacks.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States