San Diego Union-Tribune

HOUSE ETHICS PANEL TO INVESTIGAT­E SANTOS

Lawmaker’s lies, embellishm­ents have drawn scrutiny

- BY LISA MASCARO & MICHAEL R. SISAK Mascaro and Sisak write for The Associated Press.

The House Ethics Committee announced Thursday it is launching an investigat­ion into embattled Republican Rep. George Santos, the New York congressma­n whose lies and embellishm­ents about his resume and personal life have drawn deep scrutiny.

The investigat­ion appears to be far reaching. It seeks to determine whether Santos “may have engaged in unlawful activity with respect to his 2022 congressio­nal campaign” among other actions, the committee said in a statement.

The panel will also investigat­e whether Santos “failed to properly disclose required informatio­n on statements filed with the House, violated federal conflict of interest laws in connection with his role in a firm providing fiduciary services, and/or engaged in sexual misconduct towards an individual seeking employment in his congressio­nal office,” the statement said.

Santos had already removed himself from his committee assignment­s but otherwise has refused calls from Republican­s in New York to step down from office. On Twitter, his office said that he is “fully cooperatin­g ” with the ethics probe and would not comment further.

Ethics committee members

David Joyce, R-Ohio, and Susan Wild, D-Pa., will lead the probe, with two other lawmakers from each party. The panel had voted unanimousl­y to establish a subcommitt­ee to investigat­e the allegation­s.

“The Committee notes that the mere fact of establishi­ng an Investigat­ive Subcommitt­ee does not itself indicate that any violation has occurred,” Thursday’s statement said.

The committee could take an array of actions, from a letter of reprimand to recommendi­ng censure and a fine.

It can also recommend expulsion, the sternest form of punishment the House can impose, an action it has used only five times in more than two centuries and never when it comes to conduct that took place before a member was sworn in to office. At least two-thirds of the House must vote for expulsion for it to occur.

Any recommenda­tion would be part of a committee

report that states the evidence supporting its findings and an explanatio­n of the reasons for the recommende­d sanctions.

A Long Island prosecutor has already been investigat­ing whether Santos defrauded supporters. The Federal Election Commission has repeatedly flagged problems with Santos’ campaign finance reports.

Santos admitted that he lied about key parts of his background, including his job experience and college education, after The New York Times raised questions in December about the life story that he presented during his campaign.

Santos said he obtained a degree from Baruch College in New York, but the school said that couldn’t be confirmed. Santos had also said he had worked for Citigroup and Goldman Sachs, but neither company could find any records verifying that.

A Jewish news outlet, The Forward, questioned a claim on Santos’ campaign website that his grandparen­ts “fled Jewish persecutio­n in Ukraine, settled in Belgium, and again fled persecutio­n during WWII.”

“I never claimed to be Jewish,” Santos told the Post. “I am Catholic. Because I learned my maternal family had a Jewish background I said I was ‘Jew-ish.’”

Perhaps the most serious questions facing Santos involve the personal fortune he claims to have used to finance his campaign.

Since announcing his candidacy in 2021, Santos has reported loaning his campaign organizati­on $705,000, accounting for nearly 25 percent of its receipts over the last two years.

The underlying question remains how Santos earned the money. When Santos first ran for Congress in 2020, his financial disclosure form listed a modest $55,000 salary from a financial company and no significan­t assets.

Last summer, Santos filed a financial disclosure report suggesting an explosion in his personal wealth.

Santos reported he was making $750,000 per year from his own company, the Devolder Organizati­on, had $1 million to $5 million in savings and owned an apartment in Brazil worth up to $1 million. Santos has yet to fully answer questions about how he got so rich so quickly. In an interview with news site Semafor, Santos said he worked as a consultant for “high net worth individual­s,” helping broker the sale of luxury items like yachts and planes.

 ?? ANDREW HARNIK AP FILE ?? Rep. George Santos, R-N.Y., faces an investigat­ion by the House Ethics Committee.
ANDREW HARNIK AP FILE Rep. George Santos, R-N.Y., faces an investigat­ion by the House Ethics Committee.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States